Dave Benjamin said:
Are you one of those RJDC types that thinks more NWA pilots should be furloughed so you can have more flying?
No, but thanks for asking. You did ask didn't you?
I bet 10-15 years from now you'll be real happy with that decision.
I already said no. The mainline pilots defined their flying. All of us make the best of the situation to suit our needs. Management has done the same thing. Can you blame them for moving narrow body flying to RJs if it is more cost effective to thier business model, was lawful IAW with RLA and CBA scope?
I hope the pilots of NWA are able to pick up that 70 seat flying for themselves and get their furloughs back in the cockpit.
Me too.... Hopefully they will scope themselves back into it.... I'd rather fly an RJ as a NWA/UAL/DAL/AMR pilot then as a vendor pilot. Hindsight is 20/20, but with current concessionary contracts dictating that furloughed mainline pilots will be given RJ jobs says to me scope might've included all flying.
If I am missing something in the history, please let me know.
Regarding jumpseats it's best to remember that pilots don't control access. Management and the Feds decide who gets it and who doesn't. A professional does not try to hide his feelings of inadequacy by denying the jumpseat to qualified pilots except in extraordinary circumstances IE: the 50 Feedom guys that sold out in the beginning.
Where I come from we negotiated the Capt to have
unquestionable authority with an
unlimited jumpseat policy. Jumpseating became more than a privlidge, it became a negotiated
right!
That's right; a professional doesn't try and make an RJ pilot feel like garbage just becuase he happens to request a jumpseat. RJ pilots aren't the cause of mainline pain.
Look....ALL Air Line Pilots are taking hits. Beating someone down to justify ones pain isn't a solution.
I had to buy a pass on UAL last week because they already had a jumpseater. BFD. Am I going to whine about it next time I have a UAL guy on my plane? Nope. He's already well aware of the pathetic policy and he doesn't have any way of changing it. What's the point? Does anyone think that by screwing a fellow pilot the managment at his company will make a change?
There is no politics in jumpseating. What this means is, when a mainline pilot interacts with a regional/express pilot it is time to stop whining about how RJs are ruining the industry. It's gets old when requesting the jumpseat and
granting it!
Last week I requested the j/s on mainline and had to hear the displaced CA cry in his Wheaties about how the RJ's are ruining his livlihood. I wanted to give him my kids pacifer, but as the requesting j/s'er I went into training department mode; cooperate graduate.
According to his sob story I should've told my wife and baby that 'we can't eat and pay the mortgage so Capt "what's his nuts" won't get displaced'. I am sure he'd set up a nice memorial in his crewroom for all the RJ would-a-ben pilots who "took one for [his] team." I can barley crack 60k and never 'took' a vacation and this guy has to sell his timeshare. Wah....
But this isn't about politics and CBA negotiation. This is about the jumpseat. I need to get to work, you need to get to work. So what does politics have to do with it? I won't tell you who to vote for, what pro issue to contribute to and don't wear a scope badge while requesting a jumpseat on a RJ. Especially when that RJ is taking one home....
Rant over, you may now return to your regularly scheduled programming...