Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Jetblue may bid on ATA gates at MDW

  • Thread starter Thread starter lowecur
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 11

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lowecur

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
2,317
Well, well, it looks like the two Dave's have finally come to their senses. It just made no sense for them not to get involved. For those of you who snickered at my questioning their silence ...........vindication.:) It looks as though they have probably been in discussions with the city of Chicago. The city has always claimed that these gates are not ATA's to sell. With Jetblue stating that they would be interested in the gates "once ATA stops service," this affectually throws a monkey wrench into the AAI/ATA deal. You can bet the city is more interested in Jetblue than Airtran. And you can also bet, these gates won't cost Jetblue a dime.;) ;) George, Joe, Gary, and Doug, congratulations....... you've just been Neelebargered.:D :D

JetBlue May Seek to Bid on ATA's Chicago Gates, Neeleman Says

Nov. 17 (Bloomberg) -- JetBlue Airways Corp., a low-fare carrier that primarily serves the East Coast, may accelerate plans to begin flights to Chicago by bidding on Midway Airport gates leased by bankrupt ATA Holdings Corp.

``We'd probably get in the market,'' JetBlue Chief Executive Officer David Neeleman said in an interview. ``We'll be in Chicago someday and would move that up if something were to happen to ATA.''

ATA Holdings said on Oct. 26 that it agreed to sell the 14 gates to AirTran Holdings Inc. when it sought protection from creditors. Chicago officials dispute ATA Holdings' control of the gates, saying the city can reclaim and reallocate the leases if the airline is forced to reduce its operations. The transaction needs to be approved by a bankruptcy judge.

JetBlue, based in New York, would face competition from Southwest Airlines Co. if the gates became available. Southwest, the largest low-fare carrier, said last month it wanted at least seven of the gates. America West Airlines said last month it also was also considering bidding for some ATA Holdings assets.

JetBlue wants to begin flights between Chicago and New York, the third-biggest U.S. air travel market, Neeleman said. Southwest has 19 gates at Midway and has said expansion at the Chicago airport will be its top priority in 2005. Southwest has hired advisers to bid for the gates.

``We're not bidding on anything yet,'' Neeleman said. Once ATA ends service, ``we would consider definitely flying New York- Chicago.'' JetBlue already has plans for the aircraft being added to its fleet next year.

Dallas-based Southwest said Nov. 9 it would add 16 daily flights from Midway in the 2005 first quarter, bringing its total to 161.

Increasing Competition

Southwest, the world's largest low-fare carrier, and JetBlue don't compete directly, though the carriers do fly to some of the same metropolitan areas. Southwest flies from Islip airport on New York's Long Island, and JetBlue flies into New York's Kennedy and LaGuardia airports.

``It doesn't make a lot of sense for us to go into markets where Southwest is entrenched,'' Neeleman said. ``There's a lot of other places we can go where they aren't. If we do cross swords with them one day, I think we'll do very well.''

JetBlue attracts passengers with assigned seating and televisions in the backs of seats, Neeleman said. Southwest doesn't offer those features.

JetBlue has remained profitable as larger airlines have wracked up losses exceeding $20 billion during the past three years. The carrier has depended on low costs to make money while charging low fares. Southwest is the only major airline to remain profitable since the September 11 terrorists attacks.

Shares of JetBlue fell 46 cents to $23.43 yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. They've dropped 12 percent this year.

Watching US Airways

Neeleman said last month that JetBlue would be interested in acquiring landing and takeoff slots held by US Airways Group Inc. at LaGuardia and at Washington's Ronald Reagan Airport if US Airways goes out of business. Arlington, Virginia-based US Airways also is operating under bankruptcy protection.

A 20 percent drop in jet fuel prices since Oct. 22 probably occurred too late to help JetBlue avoid a fourth-quarter loss, its first quarterly loss since selling shares to the public in April 2002, Neeleman said. JetBlue is expected to lose 3 cents a share, the average estimate of 11 analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial.

Lower fuel prices might help the airline avoid a loss in the first quarter of 2005, he said, when analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expect a loss of 5 cents a share. The price of fuel for immediate delivery in New York harbor more than doubled between Oct. 22, 2003, and this year, when it hit $1.68 a gallon. Prices fell to $1.34 yesterday.

Oil Prices

``As we get into the first quarter, if oil prices continue to come down and maybe go to the low $40s or high $30s, then certainly I think we'll be in the black again,'' Neeleman said. ``Oil is a huge determinant on whether we make money or not.''

In the third quarter, fuel accounted for 23 percent of its costs, the second-largest expense behind labor. The airline has hedges on 35 percent of its fuel needs this quarter at a price of about $25 a barrel of oil equivalent. It has hedges on about 20 percent of its 2005 fuel needs at a price of $30 a barrel. Hedges are financial instruments used to lessen price gains.

JetBlue's third-quarter profit tumbled 71 percent from a year ago to $8.42 million, or 8 cents a share, as fuel prices rose and hurricanes in the southeastern U.S. disrupted travel.
 
Last edited:
My guess (although I'm not an insurance salesman so that means I don't have a real understanding of the airline business) is Jet Blue is a day late and a dollar short on the MDW deal.
 
zero said:
My guess (although I'm not an insurance salesman so that means I don't have a real understanding of the airline business) is Jet Blue is a day late and a dollar short on the MDW deal.
This was perfect timing. I'm sure the judge will want input from the city of Chicago before giving his blessing to any gate sale. Chicago wants Jetblue in the worst way, and I just don't see Chicago going along with any gate sale, unless it's their last resort. Nope, you should have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night with the rest of us insurance salesmen.:) I'll bet Gary is shaking in his boots right about now.:eek: :D :D
 
Last edited:
lowecur said:
If we do cross swords with them one day, I think we'll do very well

Another ADD moment? :rolleyes:
 
lowecur said:
This was perfect timing. I'm sure the judge will want input from the city of Chicago before giving his blessing to any gate sale. Chicago wants Jetblue in the worst way, and I just don't see Chicago going along with any gate sale, unless it's their last resort. Nope, you should have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night with the rest of us insurance salesmen.:) I'll bet Gary is shaking in his boots right about now.:eek:
What makes you think that Chicago wants JB so desperately? AirTran agreed to maintain certain employees based in Chi. AirTran's route structure very closely parallels ATA's, and includes some additional destinations not served by ATA, so Airtran would actually provide service to existing cities, plus some additional AirTran cities. They may throw JB a bone, but I don;t think they are a serious contender for 14 MDW gates.
 
Ty Webb said:
What makes you think that Chicago wants JB so desperately? AirTran agreed to maintain certain employees based in Chi. AirTran's route structure very closely parallels ATA's, and includes some additional destinations not served by ATA, so Airtran would actually provide service to existing cities, plus some additional AirTran cities. They may throw JB a bone, but I don;t think they are a serious contender for 14 MDW gates.
Ty, maybe not all 14, but you can bet your bippy that the city will not sign any long term leases on those gates, and will save them for discretionary use until Jetblue is able to fill them out. I originally said they would get between 4-6 gates in the deal, and that's probably all they will need until between the middle of 2006 to 2008. At that time, I will look for them to get the rest.
 
lowecur said:
Ty, maybe not all 14, but you can bet your bippy that the city will not sign any long term leases on those gates, and will save them for discretionary use until Jetblue is able to fill them out. I originally said they would get between 4-6 gates in the deal, and that's probably all they will need until between the middle of 2006 to 2008. At that time, I will look for them to get the rest.

I think if you re-read the articles, including those from last week, you will find that the city has already signed off on it . . . it's now up to the bankruptcy judge and the DOT. Due dilligence has apparently been done (hence the $2 million increase) and Wall Street is reacting to it today as if it is a done deal.

You also didn't address the issue I raised, which was that Airtran actually provides more of what MDW needs in the absence of ATA, which is service to ATA cities.
 
Ty Webb said:
I think if you re-read the articles, including those from last week, you will find that the city has already signed off on it . . . it's now up to the bankruptcy judge and the DOT. Due dilligence has apparently been done (hence the $2 million increase) and Wall Street is reacting to it today as if it is a done deal.

You also didn't address the issue I raised, which was that Airtran actually provides more of what MDW needs in the absence of ATA, which is service to ATA cities.
This is from a recent article "The deal is expected to close by December 23, and is subject to approval from the bankruptcy court and the city of Chicago."

AirTran certainly has a wide network, but I think the city recognizes how quickly B6 plans to grow in the next 2 years. I'm not aware of any proprietary routes that ATA offered that are not presently offered out of Chicago. The discretionary use edict should fill a void until Jetblue can grow into MDW. Look for more from Neelebarger at the Lehman conference today.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Neeleman should worry more about where to build the giant hangar required to house the parts spares that will be needed to keep the EMB Taco-Junk Jet fleet flying. SWA has never wanted ATA's whole MDW operation. When I asked Gary himself about the MDW he said we only want a small handful of gates...maybe. We still have alot of room to grow with our existing MDW gates. He is watching JBlue but definitely not "shaking in his boots."
 
Well, call me crazy, but if I had to bet on Joe Leonard and Bob Fornaro or Lowecur . . . . I'm going with the proven track record versus the wannabe airline mgmnt insurance guy.
 
Ty Webb said:
Well, call me crazy, but if I had to bet on Joe Leonard and Bob Fornacate or Lowecur . . . . I'm going with the proven track record versus the wannabe airline mgmnt insurance guy.
Ty, how mean spirited. I've always thought you were such a nice guy. Fooled again.
 
Ty Webb said:
Well, call me crazy, but if I had to bet on Joe Leonard and Bob Fornaro or Lowecur . . . . I'm going with the proven track record versus the wannabe airline mgmnt insurance guy.
OK, you're crazy. Eastern Airlines isn't exactly a proven track record.
 
Joe Peeoznotz said:
OK, you're crazy. Eastern Airlines isn't exactly a proven track record.

Hey, look, it's Joe Peanuts, that great bastion of aviation acumen.

Bob Fornaro wasn't at Eastern, and this ain't the 1980's.

Squawk, Squawk, thump.
 
I, for one, would love to see that LCC White Knight, the savior of the service industry, lowecur's holy grail, JetBlue get their asses handed to them at MDW at the hands of Southwest with the E190s that they don't even have yet.

ATA was well-positioned for growth too, before 9/11 and $50/barrel oil. Forgive me, but how is JetBlue going to pay for all those shiny new Embraers? Debt you say? Isn't that what is crushing ATA right now, debt from new airplanes? And isn't JBU's stock was down 50% this year?
 
BoilerUP said:
I, for one, would love to see that LCC White Knight, the savior of the service industry, lowecur's holy grail, JetBlue get their asses handed to them at MDW at the hands of Southwest with the E190s that they don't even have yet.

ATA was well-positioned for growth too, before 9/11 and $50/barrel oil. Forgive me, but how is JetBlue going to pay for all those shiny new Embraers? Debt you say? Isn't that what is crushing ATA right now, debt from new airplanes? And isn't JBU's stock was down 50% this year?
Easy Jethro. First of all Jetblue won't ever go against LUV with the Airbus on the same route, until the demand requires it. The 190 will totally blow the doors off the 737 in turnaround times, aesthetics, and the three E's: ergonomics, efficiency, and economics. Head to head, the customer will luv the 2X2 seating, large overheads, IFE, and assigned seating. It's really no contest once the war begins. But that really won't happen for a few years, so keep your shirt on.:cool:
 
Last edited:
lowecur said:
Easy Jethro. First of all Jetblue won't ever go against LUV with the Airbus on the same route, until the demand requires it. The 190 will totally blow the doors off the 737 in turnaround times, aesthetics, and the three E's: ergonomics, efficiency, and economics. Head to head, the customer will luv the 2X2 seating, large overheads, IFE, and assigned seating. It's really no contest once the war begins. But that really won't happen for a few years, so keep your shirt on.:cool:
What?? SWA pioneered the 10min. QT on a 737-200. In my experience with EMB equip. there is about nill chance that they will turn those E-Jets in less than 30 minutes. Let's ask a JBlue passenger what they think of the Taco Jets 3 E's and aesthetics as they sit in the terminal waiting out a mtx. delay. Then ask them about the 3 E's and aesthetics of the Holiday Inn room that JBlue bought them when their Taco-Jet flight cancelled. It really will be "no contest" when the war begins because JBlue will be sitting out several of the battles with broken E-Jets. Better sell that stock now Mr. L.
 
zero said:
What?? SWA pioneered the 10min. QT on a 737-200. And Wilbur and Orville flew the first plane. In my experience with EMB equip. there is about nill chance that they will turn those E-Jets in less than 30 minutes. Have you any experience with the E-170 series? No! Let's ask a JBlue passenger what they think of the Taco Jets 3 E's and aesthetics as they sit in the terminal waiting out a mtx. delay. That's why they keep spares at the gate, zero. Then ask them about the 3 E's and aesthetics of the Holiday Inn room that JBlue bought them when their Taco-Jet flight cancelled. It really will be "no contest" when the war begins because JBlue will be sitting out several of the battles with broken E-Jets. You're laughing like a prize fighter that just got tagged. Should have gone to Jetblue, zero. Better sell that stock now Mr. L. No!
.....:D :D ;)
 
One airline has 415 planes, the other has 60. Try to keep it in perspective Blowcur. 2,900 departures a day, and soon to be the largest domestic carrier in the US, I wouldn't toss all your Social Security check in one basket. Yea, I could have been an Insurance Salesman, but then I decided to graduate High School.
 
JetBlue not seeking ATA gates


By Ted Evanoff
[email protected]
November 17, 2004


JetBlue Airways Corp. refuted news service reports today that it intends to bid on ATA Airlines Inc.'s Chicago Midway hub.

The first offer for the 14 Midway gates came in Tuesday when ATA reached a definitive sale agreement for the gates with Orlando-based AirTrans Airways for $89.95 million. The proposed deal would include the Chicago operation, two gates at New York LaGuardia and one at Reagan Washington.

Dallas-based Southwest Airlines is also mulling a bid on the gates and Temp, Ariz.-based America West Airlines is considering buying all of ATA.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Basil Lorch III is scheduled Thursday to consider setting a deadline later in the autumn for receiving bids on the sale of part or all of ATA in his Indianapolis courtroom. The court is expected to eventually accept a bid that offers the highest payment to creditors.

Indianapolis-based ATA, the nation's No. 10 airline, has lost $120.9 million this year through September due to fare wars, falling ticket prices and rising fuel costs. Parent company ATA Holdings Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Oct. 26, listing assets of $745.1 million and liabilities of $940.1 million.

ATA's fledgling reorganization calls for spinning off leases on 49 Boeing 737 and Boeing 757 airliners, and using cash from the gate sell to obtain regional jets for use on Indianapolis routes.

Read tomorrow's Indianapolis Star for more details about this story.




Email this Print this Post message Send letter to editor Reprint info
 
JetBlue not looking for gates. All that hate spewed for no reason. Sorry boys, work on the cleaning part again. I get a kick out of all the prima donnas out there in know it all land.:D
 

Latest resources

Back
Top