Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is this part 91 or 135?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhc8fo
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 6

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
As our local Feds are fond of saying, 135 has nothing to do with whether money changes hands or not...it's "holding out" that makes the difference.

There was a guy around our area a number of years back that got his pilot certificate revoked because he was flying people around for free, apparently so he could build some time. Yee-ha!

David
 
climbhappy said:
angelking,

i would think the lear operator would have been violated for having a crewmember not authorized to fly in the seat , than speculative revenues.

the fed 's lawyers would have a hard time proving the amount of future revenues. i realize you may just be relating a relevent case here

Yes, you would think, but from my memory he was gigged for the "speculative revenues"

AK
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom