Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Insurance requires 1000 turbine for F/O?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

scubabri

Junior Mint
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
550
Give me a break. I just heard about an insurance requirement for 1000 hours of ME Turbine for a F/O on a westwind. This can't be right.

I'm really getting fed up with this insurance crap. The company that I work for requires 500 me time for an Aztec. It seems that no matter what I do or how many hours I have it's never gonna be enough and I'm gonna be stuck flying 172's for the rest of my life.

How the heck can I move upward, when the stupid insurance companies keep raising the minimums? Is it me or is this really happening, and if it is, why? Is it 9/11? Excess pilots? Greed? High claims?

How frustrating!!

b
 
scuba,

I don't recall off of the top of my head what our mins are for F/Os. However, I am not surprised about the turbine min and yes, the underwriters are driving the train, as bad as that might be.

This is driven somewhat by supply and demand. Lots of folks out there with lots of turbine time on the streets. The underwriters know this and build that into the mix for mins. They are not stupid. The mins are based on some statistical data they have at hand.

With your posted time I am somewhat surprised that you would raise the question. I had over 10,000 hours before I learned how easy jets were to fly. Timing is everything in this business as in many other occupations.

Keep building the turbine time and something will open up for you. Don't give up hope and enjoy the air time you get, each and every time you fly, regardless of the airframe.
 
I think his point is the Catch-22 of it all.

How are you to build the time if you can't become eligible to begin with?

1000 hours turbine required to be second in command or 500 to fly a dumpy Aztec is ridiculous.
 
It might seem ridiculous and maybe it is. But there are other aircraft to build turbine time in besides a jet. Jets, in my view, are considerably easier than turbo props but the insurers don't ask me for my opinion.

The PIC mins for our aircraft from our underwriters are:

PIC Time: 5,000 total, 3,000 ME, 1,000 Jet and 50 in type. Take these times and basically cut them in half for a F/O. Both have to have attended airplane specific training in the last 12 months.

Sound high? You be they are. Corporate aviation has always, from my knowledge, had higher min requirements than 135 or 121 ops. Just the way it is.
 
The pilot minimums that are quoted are from what is called the open pilot clause. The higher the minimums the lower the cost. It is possible to be placed on the insurance by name. That method allows the company two things. Putting an individual pilot on by name is much less expensive than lowering the open pilot clause minimums. And to makes it easy to say to the mulitude of applicants that 'Sorry, you do not meet our insurance minimums'.

If they really want you bad enough, they can put you on by name.
 
I am not sure about lower premiums if one if named in the policy. We have our pilots named in the policy and others unnamed must meet the mins. We had a stipulation where one who did not quite meet the mins was allowed to fly and log PIC time as long he was flying with one of the named pilots. I doubt seriously that reduced our premiums. It was an out to allow us to use this person. Bottom line is if you don't meet the mins then the premiums will probably be higher and the only way to have coverage for the low time type is to be named in the policy.
 
We carry high limits of liability, so our pilot mins are high:

Beechjet/Diamond:
-PIC needs: 3,500 TT-PIC including 2500 ME, 1000 JET, 100 hrs in Type and school within the past 12 months.
-SIC needs: 2,000 TT-PIC including 1000 ME, 500 Turbine and school within the past 12 months.

King Air:
-PIC needs: 2,500 TT-PIC including 1500 ME, 500 Turbine, 50 hrs in Type and school within the past 12 months.
-SIC needs: 1,000 TT-PIC including 500 ME.


As was stated previously, these are open pilot qualifications. Our Dir. of Ops has the authority to override these minimums, however he keeps pretty close to them.

We use pilot services quite often, and I have seen the insurance allow a pilot to SIC on the Diamond with <5 hours of jet time. Granted, it was only a 1 to 2 time allowance.

One positive thing for lower time pilots is that I have noticed is that the insurance companies seem to be more interested in school rather than the total times. For example, we have more difficulty getting approval for a pilot with >5000 TT and tons of jet time but no school than we do with a pilot with <2000 TT and practically no jet time but has been to school. The insurance company wants school to show knowledge of the specific aircraft.

I know schools are expensive, but the company will probably pay for it if they are interested in you. Networking is the key.

Good Luck.
 
Corp,

You mention the school requirement. I know what you say is true. You may already know this and if so I apologize. A few years ago FSI brought in all the underwriters and gave them their pitch on quality of their training and thereby raising the level of safety in the business aviation community. From that point forward the underwriters started requiring school training more than ever before. I can't disagree with FSI's pitch but it does seem a little odd the Warren Buffett's company owns FSI and USAIG. He has made tons of money on both endeavors.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top