Cooper
Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2002
- Posts
- 11
I’ve worked for my present employer since 98 and since then we have gone thru planes like socks.
Started off in a Lear 60, then jumped to a Lear 55 and a 35 for a very brief time then onto a Falcon 50, then back to the Lear 35, then back to the Falcon and finally back to the 60 which I’m flying now.
Currently I fly PIC and SIC on the 60 and SIC on the 35, not that big a deal but the boss has this predisposition to buy planes for various reasons, from the financially defensible to the primitive reason that he just likes the thing.
We were informed the other day that yet another type of equipment would soon arrive on the property.
The boss has asked for input on the best for us, he laid out the requirements, a range of 4,000 nm, seating for 8 or more and less than 5 years old. But we feel he has already made up his mind on our next purchase. Most of us suggested a Falcon 900 because we already have two PIC typed pilots onboard and most of us have exposure to Dassault equipment, I also suggested a CL-604.
But the boss seems to be keen on a Gulfstream IV or V.
He’s got the cash to absorb the purchase no problem as well as operate the thing but the questions arose which jet would be replaced and he responded non of them, he wanted to keep the present equipment as well. No new pilots would be hired we would just type some of our existing people to crew the jet.
That would mean that some of us would be flying three rather complex jets most likely on a weekly and sometimes on a daily basis. I’ve done trips where we had an early morning jaunt to Chicago in the 60 with a two hr layover then return, jumped in the 35 for a quick multi stop trip around the gulf coast then depart that night for Hawaii in the Falcon. These trips are rare but do happen.
So my question is this, how many types is/are too many to safely attempt to fly? Two, Three etc… or as many as you can maintain currency on?
Frank
Started off in a Lear 60, then jumped to a Lear 55 and a 35 for a very brief time then onto a Falcon 50, then back to the Lear 35, then back to the Falcon and finally back to the 60 which I’m flying now.
Currently I fly PIC and SIC on the 60 and SIC on the 35, not that big a deal but the boss has this predisposition to buy planes for various reasons, from the financially defensible to the primitive reason that he just likes the thing.
We were informed the other day that yet another type of equipment would soon arrive on the property.
The boss has asked for input on the best for us, he laid out the requirements, a range of 4,000 nm, seating for 8 or more and less than 5 years old. But we feel he has already made up his mind on our next purchase. Most of us suggested a Falcon 900 because we already have two PIC typed pilots onboard and most of us have exposure to Dassault equipment, I also suggested a CL-604.
But the boss seems to be keen on a Gulfstream IV or V.
He’s got the cash to absorb the purchase no problem as well as operate the thing but the questions arose which jet would be replaced and he responded non of them, he wanted to keep the present equipment as well. No new pilots would be hired we would just type some of our existing people to crew the jet.
That would mean that some of us would be flying three rather complex jets most likely on a weekly and sometimes on a daily basis. I’ve done trips where we had an early morning jaunt to Chicago in the 60 with a two hr layover then return, jumped in the 35 for a quick multi stop trip around the gulf coast then depart that night for Hawaii in the Falcon. These trips are rare but do happen.
So my question is this, how many types is/are too many to safely attempt to fly? Two, Three etc… or as many as you can maintain currency on?
Frank