Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Gla Ta

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

canadflyau

Well-known member
Joined
May 2, 2002
Posts
437
http://www.ibt747.org/airlines/gla/gla-info.htm

September 21, 2004
This is a hotline message from Jason Hedgepeth, Communications Manager for Local 747

On September 20th and 21st, the union negotiating committee met with National Mediation Board Mediator, Jack Kane and company representatives. These meetings were called by the National Mediation Board in a final effort to reach a tentative agreement between the company and pilot group.

The parties exchanged proposals covering Duration, Per Diem and Pay Scales. The company remained adamant that there was no money available to offer the pilots any significant economic gains, and their proposals indicated such. The union’s counter-proposals were met with very little interest from the company.

The proposals dealt with pay scales on the date of signing, subsequent yearly increases, increases in the current per diem rate and the company’s desire for a four year contract. The union pushed for increases each year of the contract, annual increase in per diem and a shorter contract of two or three years depending on the economic gains.

There is no agreement yet, but the union believes that there will be a tentative agreement within the next 48 hours. The union feels that this will be the best agreement we can achieve and the terms and contract changes of the agreement will be in a package sent out to all pilots for ratification. The union will also set up membership meetings to explain the agreement and answer questions.

For your ballot to count, you must be a member in good standing and current on your dues payments. Please call Karen Wilcox at 800-747-2313 ext11 to verify your membership status.

Please check the union bulletin boards and the hotline message for any further developments.
 
Last edited:
I for one won't vote yes on some crappy TA if we ever do get one. We've worked to hard and waited to long to get the dreggs that management is offering. I hope every other pilot at Lakes feels the same way.
 
canadflyau said:
The parties exchanged proposals covering Duration, Per Diem and Pay Scales. The company remained adamant that there was no money available to offer the pilots any significant economic gains, and their proposals indicated such. The union’s counter-proposals were met with very little interest from the company.


There is no agreement yet, but the union believes that there will be a tentative agreement within the next 48 hours. The union feels that this will be the best agreement we can achieve and the terms and contract changes of the agreement will be in a package sent out to all pilots for ratification. The union will also set up membership meetings to explain the agreement and answer questions.

"We're still worlds apart in pay, but it'll be done in 48 hours." WTF? If there's no money in it, why even ta it? I'd be scared it would pass. Good luck, honestly, you guys do deserve a lot more.
 
DO Not Vote Yes!!!

Your pride and self respect provide far more rewards in this industry than are realized.
 
Propsync said:
"We're still worlds apart in pay, but it'll be done in 48 hours." WTF? If there's no money in it, why even ta it? I'd be scared it would pass. Good luck, honestly, you guys do deserve a lot more.
The pilot group is just 7 days shy of 4 years of negotiations. The NMB refuses to declare an impasse. The pilots want a chance to speak, regardless. We will speak loudly, by voting NO with a united, unanimous voice.
 
I've seen the numbers from a pilot who was in on the negotiations the other day (if you can really call that negotiating). Of course you all should vote it down. However, that being said, to get up to even the very bottom of industry standard, the company would have to agree to a minimum of a $5 per hour raise for first year f/o's. I may be way off base here, but does anyone think that is really going to happen? I don't see how it's even possible with Lakes in the precarious financial condition it is in. Additionally, you are primarily an EAS carrier...that has gov't intervention written all over it and all other political issues aside, I can't imagine the current administration giving you a helping hand on this one.

I understand the GLA pilots are between a rock and a hard place right now...but what is the realisitic best case scenario you are looking for?

For what it's worth, I'm behind you guys and gals 100% and hope you stick to your guns here...but I'm wondering what you all think is going to result from all this.






......
 
Standby 1 said:
I've seen the numbers from a pilot who was in on the negotiations the other day (if you can really call that negotiating). Of course you all should vote it down. However, that being said, to get up to even the very bottom of industry standard, the company would have to agree to a minimum of a $5 per hour raise for first year f/o's. I may be way off base here, but does anyone think that is really going to happen? I don't see how it's even possible with Lakes in the precarious financial condition it is in. Additionally, you are primarily an EAS carrier...that has gov't intervention written all over it and all other political issues aside, I can't imagine the current administration giving you a helping hand on this one.

I understand the GLA pilots are between a rock and a hard place right now...but what is the realisitic best case scenario you are looking for?

For what it's worth, I'm behind you guys and gals 100% and hope you stick to your guns here...but I'm wondering what you all think is going to result from all this.




......


I think an honest contract!
What a lot of us understand is if the loads are good. And then everytime a quarter report comes out and says they are making money. How are we not able to pay us what we are worth.
 
Sounds like Lakers are voting with their feet en masse. If this keeps up, there won't be a Great Lakes left very long -- not because it went out of business, not because of a strike, but because they have NO PILOTS. By the way:

http://www.skywest.com/career/career.php


[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]PILOT GROUP INTERVIEW SCHEDULE[/font]
All Group Interviews are subject to time and location changes. Please check back periodically for confirmation.

Thursday 10/07/04
Salt Lake City, UT, SkyWest Hangar 1129 N. 3950 W. (directions) Salt Lake City, UT 9:00 AM

Friday 10/08/04 Salt Lake City, UT, SkyWest Hangar 1129 N. 3950 W. (directions) Salt Lake City, UT 9:00 AM

Tuesday 10/12/04
Chicago, IL, Radisson O'Hare 6810 No. Mannheim Rd. Rosemont, IL 2 Sessions (1st begins at 9:00 AM) (2nd begins at 2:00 PM) Thursday

10/14/04
Denver, CO, Radisson Hotel 3333 Quebec Street Denver, CO 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM

SkyWest Airlines is currently accepting resumes for CRJ pilots. Although our published minimums are 1000 hours total time, 100 hours multi engine and 100 hours instrument, competitive hours for this position are 2500 hours of total time with turbine experience preferred. Interested applicants may attend one of the events listed above. Please bring logbooks and an updated resume. If time permits applicants may have the opportunity to take the written test. Session may last up to 5 hours.
 
Interesting.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top