Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

G200 or Galaxy

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
do a search under G200 or Galaxy.

I would say "dispatch reliability" may have something to do with it. I know for a fact more than a few were given back for purchase price towards a real Gulfstream...and others were/are in litigation - like drop the thing off at love field and leave it to the lawyers litigation.

IMHO and experience the A/C has some good qualities. Decent performance, roomy cabin for a midsize aircraft (err.. "super" midsize, sorry)

If it has some reliability it may be a very capable domestic aircraft - "If" being the key word.
 
Last edited:
Big issue was in the begining was the only folks who knew how to work on it werein Dallas. Still not many svc centers around for it.. Had a ton of computer problems..Major Fadec, minor fadec, etc. Bad door design..(got great pictures of a fed that really screwed one up somewhere on this hard drive). The plus side was a very comfortable and fun airplane to fly. One of the quietest planes I've been in. All the sales hype and no payoff. Like most others cant do all the above M.85, FL450, etcWeight was the monster issue, comletion was a nightmare ended up wayyyyyy overweight. They claimed Chicago-Paris. full fuel and we were at MGW. So hence no pax...also to do it you had to go at .74 or less. fun huh. and no autothrottle in NAT TRAK is a pain.
Dont want to scare you off--nice plane but you can do better----
 
G200

NetJets requirements have caused Gulfstream to put the Galaxy on a diet to insure it's trans-Atlantic capabilities...


GV
 
GVFlyer said:
NetJets requirements have caused Gulfstream to put the Galaxy on a diet to insure it's trans-Atlantic capabilities...


GV

That is good thing, correct? Is it working?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top