Mookie
luckiest man alive
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2002
- Posts
- 879
Mookie, you having a kid and getting married again?.....in that order??? (-:
Not this time.
just trying to help my Alaska guys get the same rights that every other carrier gets.
mookie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mookie, you having a kid and getting married again?.....in that order??? (-:
That's not what my state told me. I went to the DOL here in TN and was told that I was only entitled to 4 weeks, not the full 12, under FMLA for my wife when she gave birth to my son, UNLESS she had a health complication or he was considered high risk (which he wasn't).HR Diva here--married to a pilot....
Ok let's look at the facts (because there is a lot of misinformation on this thread):
2. If you are a father who requests time to bond due to the birth of a child, adoption of a child or placement of a foster child, you are entitled to the full 12 weeks (unless the spouse also works for the same employer--then it's 12 weeks total).
TN has the same rule on the books, that's why I used 1,000. Didn't know other states required more hours worked.4. Some states also have leave laws which may be more lenient. For example, NJ has the Family Leave Act which allows for 12 weeks in a 24 month period and only requires 1,000 hours worked in the last 12 months.
It did, thanks. What also might be helpful is the exact legislation number and date it was added to the rule books to accompany any letters the Alaska guys and gals need to serve their management team to force compliance with FMLA guidelines...?I hope this helps clarify some of the questions posed. Please feel free to ask more if needed.
HR Diva
http://www.patientadvocate.org/index.php?p=128I was out on FMLA leave for the last 4 months at Kalitta for my shoulder surgery, and they charged me my ENTIRE insurance premiums, and not just my normal payroll deductions. I'm still investigating the legality of that, as the way I understood FMLA, they could make you continue to pay YOUR part of the health insurance, but were still required to pay THEIR part of the insurance payments.