Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Flexjet/Jet Solutions

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

gret

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Posts
1,008
What is the relationship between these two companies? Does it have to do with the fact that Flexjet can't hold a Part 135 certificate? If so, how does this work in light of the TAG and AMI shutdown in 2007?
 
You are correct in that Flexjet, which is wholely owned by Bombardier, a Canadian company, cannot hold a 135 certificate and does not in fact hold one. Jet Solutions LLC. is a US company completely separtate from Flexjet and is our 135 certificate holder. Noone on the JSLLC side is paid by Flexjet or Bombardier. Hope this helps.

What is the relationship between these two companies? Does it have to do with the fact that Flexjet can't hold a Part 135 certificate? If so, how does this work in light of the TAG and AMI shutdown in 2007?
 
The issue with Tag and AMI was that most of the employees were at TAG, a foreign owned company, while AMI held the air carrier certificate. The FAA determined that TAG was in actual control of AMI and revoked their certificate and they ended up at Sentient.

Probably Flexjet is set up differently. If the air carrier controls dispatch/mtx/ and crewmembers, probably not a problem.

I thought that Bombardier/Flexjet owned part of Jet Solutions.
 
Is Jet Solutions a better, worse, or about equal as far as pay, benefits, qol, etc. in comparison to FlexJet? Never heard of them until reading this post.
 
Jet Solutions is merely the 135 side of Flex's house.

The biggest issue with it is to make sure that both the crew and passengers know who has operational control of the flight.
 
Last edited:
Yes and no. The important part to remember is the JSLLC is soley owned and has nothing to do with Bombardier/Flexjet. While the way we operate are merely identical, there is a clear separation there and that is what keeps us from the TAG/AMI issue.

To answer another question, JSLLC is merely our means of doing the Flex cards, demos and our owners selling and purchasing shares. Also, there are some tax advantages for our owners to be on the 135 certificats as opposed to owning the share themselves. There are no line pilots who are paid by JSLLC directly. At least not that I am aware of. But I am by far no means of a know all be all.

but you gotta admit CL300, we are walking a fine line
 
Yes and no. The important part to remember is the JSLLC is soley owned and has nothing to do with Bombardier/Flexjet.

who is the dude that owns jet solutions? whoever he is, he does not seem all that involved in his company. dont you think that bombardier tells this guy what to do? I doubt he makes any independent decisions. So I agree that on PAPER they are completely separate companies, but in reality....

and their website was built but a 3 year old: http://www.jetsolutions.com

but then again, I suppose being separate on paper is all we need to stay out of trouble
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top