First Class Medical

[wt219200]

'Twas meant in jest, Sir. Hopefully indicated by the 'rolleyes' symbol.
The meaning of my comment is that we are all in the same boat, here; we all share the g*#ldanged irritation at the hard-to-follow wording of the regulations, especially this one, and many of the other 'currency' ones.

Sorry came across a little too strong there. I was reading a FAR/AIM at the time.

 

[avbug]

Kid? Thats funny. Riff-Raff? Thats also funny. I'm sure I'm the first person to misinterpret a reg, I should send my tickets back to the FAA. If there were only a way to eliminate the Riff-Raff on flightinfo like this jackass.

Nosehair made a kindly comment. I was a little taken back to see to see that anyone took it any other way. Nosehair does quite a bit of work here, helping people and addressing issues such as this. I don't believe I've ever seen him do anything that would warrant being called a jackass.

 

[wt219200]

Nosehair made a kindly comment. I was a little taken back to see to see that anyone took it any other way. Nosehair does quite a bit of work here, helping people and addressing issues such as this. I don't believe I've ever seen him do anything that would warrant being called a jackass.

Yup sorry. Again, I took it as a smart response not in jest as he intended. I've gone back back and read many of his posts and I would agree with your above post.

 

[avbug]

I think that's really the thing about the internet...it lacks expression to a large degree. Often context leaves the only clue...is the poster sarcastic, angry, impartial? Flightinfo sees a lot of contention go on which in many cases I think is nothing more than inferences to the post which can't speak for itself. No big deal; these are only words.

I think most would agree that your input is just as valueable here as any other. Post on!