Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Fatigue Loophole?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No group should EVER have to negotiate a 'call-in-fatigue' provision. That provision is already covered in the 'fit-to-fly' provision in the regulations.

The correct stance, IMHO, is to negotiate a 'minimum-adequate-rest' provision. Then the fatigue issue becomes MUCH less relevant.
 
You have to negotiate in pay protection or we'll have the same type stuff the airlines do. You call in fatigued at an airline, you lose money. You call in fatigued at NJA and you go to the hotel. The report waits til you're properly rested.

BTW, the reason behind the report was allegedly so they can track reasons behind fatigue calls and try to correct them. We all know they ask the wrong questions and 80% of those calls would stop if the OSU interns would put down the crack pipe, but it is what it is.
 
No group should EVER have to negotiate a 'call-in-fatigue' provision. That provision is already covered in the 'fit-to-fly' provision in the regulations.

The correct stance, IMHO, is to negotiate a 'minimum-adequate-rest' provision. Then the fatigue issue becomes MUCH less relevant.

I like your thinking here.
 
I see that you don't enjoy it when someone calls you out on something.
I'm sorry, among all the languages they teach at Auburn, BS isn't one of them.
 
aww man

Mr Management trying to be funny
After spending plenty of time ticking management off as a rep in a previous life, thanks for the laugh.:laugh:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom