Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who has "dot.com" as a call sign? Curious.
still need to use a tail number to file.
Happy thanksgiving Gup.Uh...... when's the last time you saw a tail number on one of our PDC's or flight plans?
Gup
Happy thanksgiving Gup.
Now, try to imagine another world where you need to actually file a real flight plan, not a company PDC product, out there in the real world you need to provide tail numbers.
Geesh....
Happy thanksgiving Gup.
Now, try to imagine another world where you need to actually file a real flight plan, not a company PDC product, out there in the real world you need to provide tail numbers.
Geesh....
I heard from a friend of a friend of a friend that it is some company that corporate uses to keep their tail numbers out of public view, or public ear in this case. They file your flight plan under a dot com call sign for a fee. They make money and the corporation is on the down low.
Uh...... when's the last time you saw a tail number on one of our PDC's or flight plans?
Gup
Who's "Redstripe?".
Some-one asked that the other day on ATC, the pilot said they were a charter op mainly used by some hot-shot realtor outfit in the south.
pair_of_pratts said:However, now the problem is at least one FSDO dude is going after part 91 flights that are using call signs instead of the tail number and threatening huge fines.
The "Dot Com" solution is a good one to get around the whole BARR thing. However, now the problem is at least one FSDO dude is going after part 91 flights that are using call signs instead of the tail number and threatening huge fines.