ashtonvillageuk
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Posts
- 43
Dear All
I should like to bring to your attention the following from this month's edition of Aircraft Illustrated, this covers the recent meeting of the Save-Concorde Group at the Cribbs Business Centre, Bristol. This makes clear that there is "NO" justifiable reason why Concorde should not return to our skies in a heritage role, am certain you will come to the same conclusion. To return Concorde to flight is possible, we cannot abandon the most beautiful civil aircraft the world has ever seen. She is our heritage, Concorde must return to our skies for that is where she belongs..JOIN THE FIGHT.....
AIRCRAFT ILLUSTRATED
On 20th March, the day that the last Concorde (G-BOAF/216) was moved across Filton airfield to its new public display location, and on the 35th anniversary of the maiden flight of Concorde 001, the 'Save Concorde Group' held a public meeting at the nearby Cribbs Business Centre to launch a campaign to get Concorde back into the air.
Ross Mallett, a management accountant and chairman of the group said that the action group would do everything to get the 'great white bird' airborne again. 'This is an innovative scheme - we aim to raise the money to enable it to return to flight. Concorde is for flying and not for museums', he told the audience. 'The campaign already has over 6,000
signatures from people who share our determination to keep '216' flying and not let this technological marvel go to waste. The aircraft must continue to be a focus of love and pride for the whole nation.'Bristol, where Concorde 216 made its first and last flights, was a logical choice for the campaign's launch venue. The Group's aim is to try and get '216' airworthy again so that the public can see it flying at airshows and national events, before it is finally placed in a museum. It is accepted that future commercial/passenger-carrying operations would not be possible.
The Save Concorde Group chairman said that discussions with various agencies including the CAA, established that there is no technological reason why Concorde should not continue to fly until at least 2017. A former senior Concorde flight engineer, Ian Kirby, said that there was no technological reason why the aircraft could not continue to fly. He estimated that it would cost about £1.5m to get '216' airworthy again for the issue of a Permit to Fly without passengers to make appearances at airshows and flypasts. With so many volunteers offering to be involved, operating costs could be in the region of £3,500 per hour.
Finance is clearly a significant issue and the CAA needs to be convinced that the proposal is feasible. British Airways, owners of the Concorde would also have to support the venture. Ian Kirby estimated that it would probably take up to three years for '216' to be back in the air again.
Ross Mallett said they had been overwhelmed by the reaction of people who had first thought such a proposal would be impossible, but now wanted to back it. 'We are now rallying wide public support for this new initiative where the public will become the stakeholder and funding source to get Concorde into the air again. Now it has started the campaign must be kept on the boil' he said.
For more information and up-dates visit the website at www.save-concorde.co.uk please don't forget to sign the petition on the way in or out. You can also make a donation to the campaign via the website. Also view the range of Concorde merchandise, for each item purchased a contribution is made to the campaign fund.
Should you wish to become actively involved in the campaign, please drop a line to [email protected]
Kind regards
SteveSAVE CONCORDE
I should like to bring to your attention the following from this month's edition of Aircraft Illustrated, this covers the recent meeting of the Save-Concorde Group at the Cribbs Business Centre, Bristol. This makes clear that there is "NO" justifiable reason why Concorde should not return to our skies in a heritage role, am certain you will come to the same conclusion. To return Concorde to flight is possible, we cannot abandon the most beautiful civil aircraft the world has ever seen. She is our heritage, Concorde must return to our skies for that is where she belongs..JOIN THE FIGHT.....
AIRCRAFT ILLUSTRATED
On 20th March, the day that the last Concorde (G-BOAF/216) was moved across Filton airfield to its new public display location, and on the 35th anniversary of the maiden flight of Concorde 001, the 'Save Concorde Group' held a public meeting at the nearby Cribbs Business Centre to launch a campaign to get Concorde back into the air.
Ross Mallett, a management accountant and chairman of the group said that the action group would do everything to get the 'great white bird' airborne again. 'This is an innovative scheme - we aim to raise the money to enable it to return to flight. Concorde is for flying and not for museums', he told the audience. 'The campaign already has over 6,000
signatures from people who share our determination to keep '216' flying and not let this technological marvel go to waste. The aircraft must continue to be a focus of love and pride for the whole nation.'Bristol, where Concorde 216 made its first and last flights, was a logical choice for the campaign's launch venue. The Group's aim is to try and get '216' airworthy again so that the public can see it flying at airshows and national events, before it is finally placed in a museum. It is accepted that future commercial/passenger-carrying operations would not be possible.
The Save Concorde Group chairman said that discussions with various agencies including the CAA, established that there is no technological reason why Concorde should not continue to fly until at least 2017. A former senior Concorde flight engineer, Ian Kirby, said that there was no technological reason why the aircraft could not continue to fly. He estimated that it would cost about £1.5m to get '216' airworthy again for the issue of a Permit to Fly without passengers to make appearances at airshows and flypasts. With so many volunteers offering to be involved, operating costs could be in the region of £3,500 per hour.
Finance is clearly a significant issue and the CAA needs to be convinced that the proposal is feasible. British Airways, owners of the Concorde would also have to support the venture. Ian Kirby estimated that it would probably take up to three years for '216' to be back in the air again.
Ross Mallett said they had been overwhelmed by the reaction of people who had first thought such a proposal would be impossible, but now wanted to back it. 'We are now rallying wide public support for this new initiative where the public will become the stakeholder and funding source to get Concorde into the air again. Now it has started the campaign must be kept on the boil' he said.
For more information and up-dates visit the website at www.save-concorde.co.uk please don't forget to sign the petition on the way in or out. You can also make a donation to the campaign via the website. Also view the range of Concorde merchandise, for each item purchased a contribution is made to the campaign fund.
Should you wish to become actively involved in the campaign, please drop a line to [email protected]
Kind regards
SteveSAVE CONCORDE