Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

CHQ new code share with AW?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

CHQ-FO

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Posts
59
Order 2004-9-19​




Served: September 20,2004



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON, D.C.


Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 20fh day of September, 2004


Application of CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC. for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under49 U.S.C. 41102 to engage in interstate scheduled air
transportation of persons, property, and mail
Docket OST-2004-18638 -5-



FINAL ORDER


By Order 2004-9-9, issued September 8, 2004, we directed all interested persons to show cause why we should not make final our tentative findings and conclusions stated in it and award a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua) authorizing it to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail using large aircraft.

Interested persons were given 7 calendar days to file objections to the order​
No objections to the show-cause order were received.​




ACCORDINGLY,​
Acting under authority assigned by the Department in its Regulations 14 CFR 385.12(a)(2):


1. We find that Chautauqua Airlines, Inc., is fit, willing, and able to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail.​

2. We issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. to engage in interstate air transportation in the form and subject to the Terms, Conditions, and Limitations attached.​

2​

3. Should Chautauqua Airlines, Inc., propose to conduct operations with more than 20 large aircraft, we direct it to notify the Department in writing at least​
45 days prior to the proposedchange in operations and demonstrate its fitness to conduct such operations before their commencement. 1


4. We direct Chautauqua Airlines, Inc., to submit to the Air Carrier Fitness Division a first yearprogress report within​
45 days following the end of its first year of certificated operations.2


5. We register “America West Express,” “American Connection,” “Delta Connection,” “United Express,” and “US Airways Express” as trade names to be used by Chautauqua Airlines, Inc., in
its certificated air carrier operations.




6.​
We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.


Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this order, under 14 CFR 385.30 may file their petitions within 10 days of the service date of this order.​

This order is effective immediately and the filing of a petition for review shall not alter itseffectiveness.​







By:​


RANDALL D. BENNETT​
Director

Office of Aviation Analysis​



An electronic version​
of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:
http://dms. dot.gov




1​
This limitation does not in any way limit the number of small aircraft Chautauqua may utilize in performing its operations. [Section 298.2(h) defines “large aircraft” as any aircraft designed to have a maximum capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pounds.]


The report shall include a description​
of the carrier’s current operations (number and type of aircraft,principal markets served, total number of full-time and part-time employees), a summary of how theseoperations have changed during the year, a discussion of any changes it anticipates from its currentoperations during its second year, current financial statements, and a listing of current senior managementand key technical personnel.





 
Last edited:
Way to edit your post and making it appear out of context.

http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf89/295677_web.pdf

The bottom of page 2 clearly states...



As a commuter carrier Chautauqua has registered the trade names “Delta Connection,” “American Connection,” “America West Express,” and “US Airways Express.” The carrier has requested registration of the “United Express” trade name in connection with its United code-share operations.​



Meaning past tense...well that's my take anyway.​
 
Last edited:
Hey jacka$$, nice personal attack for no reason and I work here myself. If they are listing all past codeshares, then where is TWA? And out of context? I listed the entire first page. Why else would CHQ list an American West affiliation in a current DOT filing if it is expired and there is no plan to use it in the future.
 
You are right that was not called for...and I appoligize. You did edit your post to make it read out of context...if you had pasted it verbatim it would have said "...has registered..." not the way you put it.

And you have a good point about the TWA thing...but it would have been TWE not TWA. I'm pretty sure I has to do woth the deal AA cooked with TWA that is why it is not listed. And for that matter why doesn't it say anything about the days when we used to fly cargo with the Metro's?

M.O.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top