Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Bottom Feeder...

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

WMU_Drew

Active member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Posts
31
If Ford uses parts from TRW (autoparts) and then Eaton bids they can do it for less, Ford uses Eaton.

So is Eaton a bottom feeder?

So does any company that WINS a COMPETITIVE bid become a bottom feeder?
 
Yep, if Eaton was paying their employees $4 per hour and TRW went to its employees, threw down Eatons Contract and said we are closing if you don't take pay rates like Eatons employees (Even though the whole parts industry worked for 20 years to get the rates they did). Underbidding means absolutely nothing when talking about bottom feeders, pay rates do...
 
What Mesa pilots did by signing off on that POS contract, on the first vote was to screw the entire small jet community. By not putting up a fight they lost the respect and more importantly the professional respect of many. ACA, Comair and AIR Willy raised the bar for all of us that fly 50 - 70 jets. For Mesa to cave is an insult to those pilots that had intestinal fortitude to fight for a better way of life.

Yes, Mesa is a bottom feeding company!
 
The sad part is that they probably could have just waited for the single carrier ruling to be granted which would have eliminated the Freedumb issue and put the ball in the pilot's court.
 
if you charge such a low rate that the rate is 'out of the norm' for that type of work done, and for the sole purpose of taking work away from others... yes.

say the standard is 15/hour. a few others charge anywhere between 13 and 17, each get their own clientelle (sp?) for their own reasons.. loyalty and satisfaction from the higher charging guy; same can be said for the lower-end charging guy, but probably picks up a few newer clients due to the 2 dollar cost savings from the average. then someone comes in and charges 10 bucks for the work done. it's hard to compete with that cost savings. loyalty slowly disappears, when the clients' checkbook starts looking a little thin, and realizes he can get the same service for 5 dollars cheaper.
now to compete, the others have to lower their rates to 10 dollars... some will be able to struggle along, others won't be able to survive.
it's pure economics, pure competition. the end result is, everyone struggles along, making at least 5 bucks less than they know they should be.
only way to maintain a respectable level is to lose the 'me me me' attitude, look at the big picture, and see how your personal decisions affect the world around you. i know it's hard to do when your back is against the wall, and it seems that some other guy at some other airline can fend for himself, so who cares? but, that's an attitude that needs to be changed, throughout the whole industry, regionals to majors, etc.
 
like I have said before, we dont work for 30% less than other regionals. Perhaps 10% less, but it is a free market economy. We also have 13 bids per year so the 70 hour guarantee works out to be 75.83 hours per month.

With UAL barely surviving how dare ACA enter talks with trying to raise their fee-per-departure! Almost every single carrier except JBLU and SWA bleeding billions and you think you can go on like nothing ever happened? We all have to share the pain of the current economic conditions. Jesus, you think MESA casued this? How about 9-11 and United losing over TWO BILLION DOLLARS in one quarter!! AMR losing billions. Delta in the red over 200 million a quarter. National...gone. Midway...gone. Who's next?? SWA came so close to having its second unprofitable quarter EVER last year!

That Q1 2001 UAL lost more money than it HAD EVER MADE IN THE PREVIOUS 60+ YEARS OF OEPRATION.

Now we have the 199$ round trip fun-fare flip-flop and sweatpants crowd dictating the fares, and the airlines that dont react to that will be history!!

If we can provide comparable service for a lower cost structure then UAL and others will take a look at us.
 
As a very junior FO at ACA I am on pace to make about 35 grand this year, my first year I might add. That is more than a 1900 captain with Masa, isn't it. Trust my you guys at Masucks are 30% behind. You should have waited. And ACA didn't try to raise the fee per departure. We just wanted the cost adjustment that was in the agreement with UAL.
 
The airline industry is cyclical...I knew this downturn was going to happen, even before 9/11. Now how come the Harvard MBAs running these airlines couldn't see it coming. We all messed up, negotiate for the future not the present.

Mayday
 
I recently flew to an eastcoast city (dominated by Usair) out of DFW. $360.- rt on ATA, $500 on Continental, $1200 on UA, $1500 on AA and $1700 on USair. I finally took Airtran that charged 240.- one way (didn't feel like making it an 8 hr affair going through Midway) and flew into a different airport. I had to rent a car and drive an hour, but I needed the car anyway. I f I had flown USAir I would have gotten the same bag of pretzels and a drink, probably without the smile.
All these tickets were 4 days in advance, no saterdaynight stay, non refundable.
Do I see a reason here maybe that some carriers are in chapter 11 or close to it? Or that some airlines like ATA, Jetblue, SWA and Airtran are doing well? You can't come with the argument of a one type fleet, ATA has at least 3, not counting it's feeder. The operating cost of the major ones are higher than low cost carriers, but that should equate to maybe 10 or 20 bucks a ticket, not a price tripple that of other airlines
 

Latest resources

Back
Top