midlifeflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,096
- Base airport
- KTTA
I agree. My gripe with the Part 61 FAQ answer is that it spoke out of both sides of its mouth. Through in unnecessary language that made it unclear. This one is not much better.A Squared said:Hmmm, I guess that this is sort of a Rorschach Inkblot of a legal opinion. I probbably need to re-read it one sentence at a time and digest it slowly. A little too early in the (my) morning for that sort of concentrated effort though. I think that the only real conclusion that one can draw from this is that Loretta Alkalay has extrordinarily poor writing skills. The first interpretation was an embarrasment, it was completely ungrammatic, and this one isn't much better.
The problem may simply be that there have been budget cuts in all of the FAA Legal regional offices. Especially at the Regional level, there's probably neither the time nor the inclination to really think some of these through for consistency.