Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ATA sale delayed until 12/21

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lowecur

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
2,317
Apparently the bidders are raising the ante. It's stupid for AAI to get into a bidding war with SWA. I still have to believe common sense will rule the day, and the Justice Department will see past the SWA bid. If I were AAI, I would stick to my guns and let the JD bring down the SWA bid.

I still believe all this convoluted mess will play right into B6's hand. Richard Daley are you listening?

Decision is delayed on ATA sale
Winner to be chosen Tuesday after look at improved offers.
http://www.indystar.com/images/clear.gif
By Ted Evanoff

December 15, 2004


Rival bidders AirTran Airways and Southwest Airlines considered increasing their offers Wednesday to try to win control of bankrupt ATA Airlines's Chicago Midway gates.

ATA and its creditors reviewed the two complicated bids and decided to set back to next Tuesday a hearing, originally scheduled for today, in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Indianapolis to select a winner, said ATA bankruptcy lawyer James Carr. "There has been a lot of discussion regarding the bids and possible enhancements to the bids," said Carr. He declined to disclose details.

Indianapolis-based ATA plans to come out of bankruptcy and regroup using cash from a Midway gate sale.

AirTran and Southwest went into Wednesday's discussions after proposing dramatically different bids. Either could change the direction of 7,700-employee ATA, the nation's No. 10 airline. AirTran offered $89.9 million for ATA's 14 Midway gates. Southwest bid $117 million for six gates and a Chicago maintenance facility.

"We thought we were pretty much the leading bidder," Southwest spokesman Gary Stewart said Wednesday about the Dallas company's $117 million offer.

AirTran's Tad Hutchinson, marketing director at the Orlando airline, dismissed the notion AirTran is out of the running. "We'll be looking at everything and talking to the parties involved," Hutchinson said Wednesday.

Before leaving Indianapolis on Wednesday afternoon, Southwest Airlines Chief Executive Gary Kelly insisted the company's offer best suits ATA because it injects the most cash.

"It's a turnaround situation and the first thing they need is money," Kelly said.

Southwest's offer was reported Tuesday by The Indianapolis Star as a bid that would hand the Dallas airline almost complete control of ATA.

Kelly later described Southwest's bid as an effort to expand at Midway and also inject cash in ATA -- but not control the Indianapolis carrier. "We are not taking over ATA," Kelly said.

AirTran officials, however, drew a different conclusion.

"I don't believe it" when Southwest says they don't want control, AirTran's Hutchinson said. "From what was in that document, it looks to us like they want control."

Under the bid document proposed last Friday, Southwest would loan ATA $47 million and invest another $30 million in ATA.

The investment, in the form of non-voting senior convertible preferred equity, would amount to a 35 percent stake in ATA stock that Southwest could resell at a later date.

Although such a stake would give Southwest the single largest block of ATA stock, and-enable it to influence the board of directors, Kelly said ATA would be operated independently by its own executives and board in Indianapolis.

"It's an effort to assist ATA and not take control of ATA," Kelly said. "Anyone who put in $70 million would apply the same conditions any commercial lender would apply."

Southwest's proposal also calls for ATA creditors to name a seven-member board in consultation with Southwest. The board would also appoint executives and in the process, according to the document, consult with Southwest on filling these positions: chairman, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief restructuring officer or co-restructuring officer.

"Because we're putting money in, we're interested in the management team," Kelly said.

Southwest, which now operates 19 Midway gates, also would be interested in ATA's strategic direction in Chicago.

The Dallas airline's proposal would funnel passengers to ATA in Chicago under a code-sharing arrangement that Kelly said could generate up to $25 million a year in new revenue for ATA.

Under code-sharing, ATA could sell tickets to passengers who fly on both ATA and Southwest on a single trip.

It's a new direction for Southwest because ATA could also sell tickets to Southwest passengers in cities such as Boston and Dallas. ATA flies to those two cities now from Midway, but Southwest does not.

Separately, Southwest rescinded a bid provision that called for a 15 percent to 20 percent reduction in labor costs at ATA.

Officials of the Air Line Pilots Association, which represents ATA's 1,100 pilots, have given tentative support to the Southwest bid.
 
Rival bidders AirTran Airways and Southwest Airlines considered increasing their offers Wednesday to try to win control of bankrupt ATA Airlines's Chicago Midway gates.


Could this be the start of another airline bidding war?
 
Raising the stakes on a money losing entity. Wow, I wish I had stayed at Harvard Business School for the full semester!;)
 
Lowcur you crack me up, I'm surprised you have'nt concluded that the sprint nextel merger is just a ploy for JB to takeover the cell phone market. And that ERJ will soon be manufacturing the phones for them.

Fletch
 
He has, you just missed that post.
 
lowecur said:
Apparently the bidders are raising the ante. It's stupid for AAI to get into a bidding war with SWA. I still have to believe common sense will rule the day, and the Justice Department will see past the SWA bid. If I were AAI, I would stick to my guns and let the JD bring down the SWA bid.

I still believe all this convoluted mess will play right into B6's hand. Richard Daley are you listening?
ATA provides minimal competition against Southwest at MDW---check out the overlap, it's really quite small. American and United provide the bulk of the Chicago area competition. This is a Republican administration. Think about past mergers like Northwest-Republic. The concentration issues here are minimal. You think the Justice Department is going to rule against a TEXAS airline?
 
vc10 said:
ATA provides minimal competition against Southwest at MDW---check out the overlap, it's really quite small. American and United provide the bulk of the Chicago area competition. This is a Republican administration. Think about past mergers like Northwest-Republic. The concentration issues here are minimal. You think the Justice Department is going to rule against a TEXAS airline?
You're probably right, I'm a pragmatic idealist. To think politics doesn't come in to play here is naive. If politics are the kicker, then we'll just have to see what Richard Daley is made of.:)
 
Last edited:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/48abb874-4f14-11d9-96df-00000e2511c8.html

Southwest wins battle for ATA assets
By Caroline Daniel in Chicago
Published: December 16 2004 04:10 | Last updated: December 16 2004 04:10

Southwest Airlines emerged on Wednesday as the victor in the battle for the assets of ATA, the bankrupt low-cost carrier, beating a rival offer from AirTran and underscoring its position as the largest and most successful low-cost airline in the US.

The airline has received backing from the creditors committee of ATA and from its management for its offer, worth about $100m. The plan must now receive approval in the bankruptcy court.

Southwest’s offer includes paying about $50m to take over six of ATA’s gates at Chicago’s Midway airport - its most important hub and where Southwest is already the leading airline. The package also includes $40m of debtor in possession financing to help ATA restructure, according to several people involved in the talks.

Southwest has further promised to provide permanent funding to ATA once it exits from bankruptcy, carrying over its DIP money as well as providing around $30m in the form of an equity injection. In return, it could take a stake of about 27 per cent in ATA, down from the 35 per cent it had originally sought.

Southwest does not expect to take over board seats in ATA while the creditors committee is expected to appoint a new management team to replace George Mikelsons, ATA’s founder, as chief executive. Mr Mikelsons may stay on in a non-executive role, however.

Assuming the deal is approved in the bankruptcy court, it marks a significant tactical achievement for Southwest’s management team under the leadership of its new chief executive, Gary Kelly. By adding more gates at the Chicago airport, Southwest has effectively seen off the threat of a serious rival emerging at Midway.

The deal would represent a significant blow for AirTran, which made an alternative offer of $90m to take over ATA’s 14 gates at Midway airport, and now faces the challenge of where it will put its substantial order of Boeing aircraft deliveries. It is also expected to face further pressure in its Atlanta hub from Delta Airlines.

Although the amount of cash offered by AirTran and Southwest were similar, Southwest is taking over fewer ATA gates than AirTran would. It is also offering a code-sharing deal with ATA, which could generate about $25m in net income per year for the bankrupt carrier. The code-sharing agreement, expected to last eight years, will be signed once ATA has restructured its costs and debt.

One person involved with the talks said, “the problem for AirTran is their deal gave the creditors nothing. At least with Southwest they get a code-sharing deal, and ATA keeps more of the gates. If they had put more cash in, Southwest could always match it and outbid them.”

The deal still leaves ATA in a precarious financial position, with uncertainty about what it will look like once it has restructured. America West, which had been interested in buying the whole airline, pulled out on Friday after warning that it was unable to secure new leasing deals with ATA’s lessors on acceptable terms, raising doubts about which aircraft will still be available to ATA as it restructures.

America West’s withdrawal thwarted hopes among creditors that there would be a bidding war. The auction process, which has lasted for the last few days, resulted in few significant improvements in the bids from Southwest and AirTran, except for Southwest’s agreement to reduce its potential equity stake in ATA.

According to several people, AirTran had in the last few days initiated talks with America West to discuss the possibility of a joint bid. However, the two parties ran out of time since ATA faces an important deadline of December 23rd, when it will need to secure money from one of the bids in order to make aircraft payments.

Under the section 1110 process in bankruptcy, airlines have 60 days to decide which planes they want to reject. ATA had filed for bankruptcy at the end of October.
 
I am confused, doesn' take much, but how can SWA be declared the "winner", if the decision is delayed until the 21st?

Anyone, anyone?
 
Wow! I have to agree with Lowecur on this one. It IS stupid for AAI to get into a bidding war with SWA over this. It is clear that SWA's interest in this deal lies almost entirely in blocking AAI from becoming a major presence at Midway. SWA could quickly and easily raise the stakes in the auction beyond what AAI can responsibly sustain.

I do not think that the DOJ will shoot down SWA's proposal. It is almost comical that SWA has framed this deal partially as an attempt to "assist" ATA. No airline wants to assist another airline. While SWA's bid absolutely reeks of anticompetitiveness to me, SWA has too much political influence for the DOJ to step in and block them.
 
SWA political influence, ha ha ha he!!!!! It's more like: SWA pays their bills.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top