Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Are European pilots better than American?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Oddly enough, English is not the mother tongue of much of the world, and a thread inviting comments from Europeans is probably not the venue to hash this out.

Cardinal <- avowed spelling Nazi.
 
24 carat said:
Well, Lead Sled, that is exactly my point. Why will insurance companies let European wonder pilots fly jets with much lower time than they do in the US?

Do they know something we don't?

And it is not because there aren't as many pilots around: from what I hear, in Europe, just like in the US, there are many unemployed pilots.

Wait a minute, UAL hired pilots right out of college. Their mins on the app were 250TT, not that they hired em that low, but still. The courts system allows for this, as we all know UAL was sued over minority hiring. So much for insurance in that case.

In all honesty, even if a foreign airline gives their "cadets" 40 hrs of heavy jet time in the sim, after completing the Beech Baron course, it sure would be sporty if this cadet was suddenly in charge of a 777 out over the middle of the ocean after the captain had a heart attack. 40 hours in the sim aint nothing like time in the real plane as we all know.

I am just not sure if it's fair to put the flying public in that sort of risk category. Granted, whats the chance that this could happen??? Small chance, but still.......
 
I guess the final straw was... "Your 100% correct, If I had the between the 1st 12weeks of ground school 9pm-5pm or 100hrs of flying, I would of taken the 100hrs of flying." I wasn't aware of how Europeans talk, my bad.
 
European pilots may or may not be as good looking or better pilots, but here's something that's kind of interesting...

http://www.mggraphics.net/pics/POF5.jpg

The next generation M-16 US military rifle is going to be built for the US by the Germans and they are using some really old tech to improve it. There's a correlation here and somehow I think it's going to go right over most of you all's heads.

P.S. Can anyone tell me the significance of the part just right of the rifle's pistol grip? I'll give you a clue...it's ancestry is related to my screen name, which dates back to the late 1940's.

How is it that America is going to be buying their next generation military assault rifle from a country that we had to put down big time in World War II and it's improvement comes from off the shelf tech dated by at least 50 years?
 
Last edited:
FN FAL said:
P.S. Can anyone tell me the significance of the part just right of the rifle's pistol grip? I'll give you a clue...it's ancestry is related to my screen name, which dates back to the late 1940's.


Pick Me! Pick Me! :uzi: Your answer: A gas piston-upper! Keeps gases out of the bolt and upper receiver by transfering the force to cycle the action through a long piston that lives in the gas tube. As opposed to the 100% gas-operated M16 that can get dirty, and when it gets dirty it gets unreliable.
 
Cardinal said:
Pick Me! Pick Me! :uzi: Your answer: A gas piston-upper! Keeps gases out of the bolt and upper receiver by transferring the force to cycle the action through a long piston that lives in the gas tube. As opposed to the 100% gas-operated M16 that can get dirty, and when it gets dirty it gets unreliable.
true, but why did we have to wait for the Germans to make the change? Eugene Stoner designed the M-16 and the Armalite 18. The Armalite had a gas rod system and was designed to compete against the M-16 for the new military rifle back in the early 1960's. This set up is nothing new.

how does it relate to European v. American pilots? how can you have a job flying Americans around if all the manufacturing jobs are overseas and everybody else is working as minimum wage sales clerks at a chain store?

Where's our inventors and builders of machines?
 
Enjoyed flying many hours with Brit low time wonder pilots, the training they receive must be good, all seemed very good pilots with a good attitude, much more than seat warmers as previously mentioned. I now live in Asia and fly with similar pilots trained over two years before transitioning to line operations in the ATR, then to the bus. Flying into major airports in the Airbus isn't rocket science.
 
FN FAL said:
true, but why did we have to wait for the Germans to make the change? Eugene Stoner designed the M-16 and the Armalite 18. The Armalite had a gas rod system and was designed to compete against the M-16 for the new military rifle back in the early 1960's. This set up is nothing new.

how does it relate to European v. American pilots? how can you have a job flying Americans around if all the manufacturing jobs are overseas and everybody else is working as minimum wage sales clerks at a chain store?

Where's our inventors and builders of machines?

Ahhh FN-FAL you are taking me back some years :) I learned to shoot on the SLR/L1A1 (our aussie designation) and what a reliable weapon it was. Accurate, sturdy, good size rounds at 7.62mm (whack someone with those and they doint get back up) and the steel butt plate was a perfect fit when impacting someones skull :)

Australia unfortunately moved to the steyer which is a good allround weapon but imho not as good as the SLR and my groups were no where near as tight with it.

You do take me back some years. I'm just upset I didnt see the message earlier and get to answer the question lol :)

Cheers
 

Latest resources

Back
Top