Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska reserve system

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Old School is correct. I forgot about that, they haven't done that to me in a long time. They can assign you a trip out of zone with enough notice. There are some contractual restrictions on it however, I would have to look them up. They can't, however, call you and say, "tomorrow we are changing your zone from Zone 0 to Zone 5."
 
One of the big items in our new contract is that scheduling can't call a pilot who has a reserve time that starts before 10am and flip his zone so as to have duty that goes beyond 2am. The times are off the top of my head. Basically, scheduling can't call a morning reserve, put him into rest, and make him fly a redeye.
 
Rope a dope

CAL can convert long to short 4 times before they have pay an extra penny, and they can convert all 18 days if they want. There's no limit. And the extra pay is not automatic. You have to file a pay claim in a certain time window after the 4th and every instance after. If you don't, you don't get paid. (There are many areas of the contract where they rope-a-dope the pay understanding that they'll make money because of pilots schedules there's a certain percentage who won't be able to get the pay claim in time.)

Densoo,

I found your post interesting, especially the part about ‘rope a dope’. Perhaps the pilot group, Union or Association could survey to identify how many events that require a pilot action to get paid and document a collective loss both for the pilot and the Union as dues. Many here know publishing this information is only a start of a long conversation during flights but go one step further and identify methods to eliminate such losses. For eg; When a pilot is converted which triggers a claim perhaps an Union employee or volunteer back at the Union HQ could be notified to start the claim on your behalf. I am sure the company will come in and try and say that it must be initiated and completed by the pilot but I would like to know why. Depending on the loss to the employees due to inability to file claims could be a windfall for the company. Show the data (they prolly know this already as they spend the time and dime to follow each metric but we as individuals do not and cannot afford to do so.)

Many industries now plan on consumers not filing rebate claims as a revenue stream. There are websites that detail what needs to be done to ensure that you do get that rebate. I wonder if a company could justify to sell a product after rebates and its associated management expenses then why even go through the dance of offering rebates. They know we as consumers are suckers and will not file and even if we do they will claim it was lost (http://www.complaintsboard.com/comp...les-it-was-submitted-as-required-c153295.html).

I admit, I do not understand the nuances of setting up a volunteer or staff member of the Union to handle such claims for the pilots but someone knowledgeable can chime in. After all any dues collected from the pilots from such events (conversions, etc.) could possibly pay for the staff member while the pilot who is being represented can know that the Union has his or her back.
 
Flyintin,

Your example of rebates as a scam in that few people end up submitting them and then they deny and delay until you lose track or give up is exactly what CAL's mode is with the contract. They'll dare the union to grieve an issue and then just deny, appeal, deny, appeal, until there becomes a what's the point aspect to the whole thing.

The UAL union is finding this out and it is too bad they have to become a part of this dismal treatment. Fly Now Grieve Later is the motto at CAL. I think some CAL pilots didn't want the merger to happen simply because they were too embarrassed to have anyone find out how badly they've allowed themselves to be treated for so long. It's getting pretty obvious now. You can see the four stages of grief in the blast mails coming from the UAL MEC and LECs.

The "train by pilot bulletin" is the most recent example. They rattled their swords loudly and vigorously, but in the end the UAL MEC said the FAA has approved it and for them to not do it puts their license in jeopardy. Guess what. They're doing it.

CAL's latest one is changing their IDs to UAL IDs with no union coord and little CASS/FAA/TSA coord. Lots of union shouting, but everyone did the walk to the CPO, picked them up, and now there are incidents of problems at TSA, jump seating using CASS, gen decs at customs, etc. Homeland Security isn't real fond of a person in a pilot uniform wearing an analog ID that says you work for one company when all the other digital ID data says you work for someone else. In the space of just a few days the company went from "you must turn in your CAL ID," to "pilots may opt to keep their CAL ID," to "all pilots must have both a CAL ID and a UAL ID in their possession at all times." The fact that they punched a hole in the CAL ID didn't help. It'll all work out as it always does, but it's an unreal way to treat people.

Back to your original point about pay. I "heard" that the DAL union has some full time admin folks that do nothing but go through every pay register for every flight a pilot works to ensure contractual compliance. Have further heard these admin folks find $2M to $4M of money in the pilots favor each year. Well worth the $50K or so the admin people might each get paid. Maybe someone can confirm this. It might just be wishful thinking that some union, somewhere, is constructively making gains for the pilots. But I can tell you the union doesn't do it. It's up to each pilot and individual pilots are no match for the mega-MBA rope a dope.
 
Last edited:
Old School is correct. I forgot about that, they haven't done that to me in a long time. They can assign you a trip out of zone with enough notice. There are some contractual restrictions on it however, I would have to look them up. They can't, however, call you and say, "tomorrow we are changing your zone from Zone 0 to Zone 5."

The rest loophole ends up doing the same thing.
 
I've done reserve at 3 of the 4 bases and have found that reserve at ANC, LAX and probably PDX is liveable. Reserve in SEA BLOWS!

In SEA, you get called out for every little misconnect. Sometimes the crew is only running 30 minutes behind but scheduling is worried about the plane swap...call out a reserve crew....deadhead original crew in the back...deadhead reserve crew back the same day. Probably less of that now that we are so short.

Also, not sure if it changed now that they allow line holders to pick up simulator seat-subs, but Seattle also covers those. ONCE a year is enough for me so that was also a big negative.

Average SEA reserve seems to run 50-70 hours a month. Other bases seem to average 30-50 depending on their zone.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top