Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska ranks worst in ontime performance in 2005

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

tico

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Posts
392
Alaska ranks last in on-time performance for year

Summer operational problems pushed annual numbers down

February 6, 2006

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)’s “Air Travel Consumer Report” ranks Alaska Airlines last among 19 U.S. airlines for on-time performance for 2005, with 69.7 percent of flights arriving within fifteen minutes of their scheduled time. That compares to an average of 77.4 percent of flights on-time for all airlines.
That performance is a drop from where Alaska ranked a year ago: 14th place with 76.5 percent of flights on-time for the year.

It’s also not surprising given the airline’s poor operational performance during the summer months and the struggle since then to regain the performance the airline has been known for in the past, said Glenn Johnson, senior vice president, customer service, airports.

“We’ve been through a rough patch this past year. We have not always delivered the consistent, quality experience that we’d like, for customers and employees,” he said.

Nevertheless, Johnson said the numbers have improved since July and all the elements are in place to continue to gain ground.

The airline’s performance for December ranks Alaska 16th among 20 U.S. airlines for on-time arrivals, with 67.3 percent of flights arriving close to their scheduled time. While Frontier Airlines was included in the monthly tally, it was not ranked by the DOT until mid-year, so it is not listed in the annual ranking.

The December number is an improvement from the same month in 2004, when only 63.2 percent of Alaska’s flights were on-time.

Among its 12 major competitors, Alaska ranked 9th in December, below the sixth-place ranking needed for a $50 payout under the Operational Performance Rewards (OPR) program. In 2006, the OPR goals have changed to fluctuate each month based on how the airline has performed historically, and the company will not compare itself with other airlines.

The 20 carriers reporting on-time performance recorded an overall on-time arrival rate of 71 percent in December.

Among the 20 airlines in the December DOT report, Alaska ranked 11th for percent of operations canceled (1.3 percent), 5th for mishandled bags (5.75 reports per 1,000 passengers), and 7th for number of consumer complaints (.36 per 100,000 passengers).

Alaska ranked 16th for number of passengers involuntarily denied boarding (1.58 per 10,000 passengers) for the year.

Seems that we just keep getting better and better.....But wait if we can all get together we can qualify for the "Generous performance compensation" that has been put in place to replace conventional compensation....thats right the OPR which is worth 50 dollars if we can just get to number six....with any luck... ah never mind....place is a joke...Nothing like getting your W2 to remind you of where your money went......of course there is no shortage of eager beavers to fill up those classes...so all is well in Alaska's World
 
Stop using the ACARS, and just call them in like another airline does. Guaranteed you can jump up into the top 3.

AA
 
AAflyer said:
Stop using the ACARS, and just call them in like another airline does. Guaranteed you can jump up into the top 3.

AA


I love it! I couldn't agree more AA.:beer:
 
Hard to be ontime when you're asking your boys for a 35% paycut. I wouldn't exactly be motivated under these circumstances. That toasted them for 2 months.

Gup
 
tico said:
Alaska ranks last in on-time performance for year

Summer operational problems pushed annual numbers down

Seems that we just keep getting better and better.....But wait if we can all get together we can qualify for the "Generous performance compensation" that has been put in place to replace conventional compensation....thats right the OPR which is worth 50 dollars if we can just get to number six....with any luck... ah never mind....place is a joke...Nothing like getting your W2 to remind you of where your money went......of course there is no shortage of eager beavers to fill up those classes...so all is well in Alaska's World

Yah, maybe management might someday get the idea that the pay cuts were a bad idea. One could always try blunt instruments, but that wouldn't guarantee results.
I think the Alaska crews are doing a fine job of getting the message across, and good luck to them.

C
 
AA


You calling some one a liar?
 
AAflyer said:
Stop using the ACARS, and just call them in like another airline does. Guaranteed you can jump up into the top 3.

AA

You guys actually understand how this stat is tracked? It's within 15 minutes of arrival, and I don't know many SWA guys that would give up 15 minutes of pay to have an "ontime" arrival. ACARS isn't not going to change that stat much.
 
Last edited:
AAflyer said:
Stop using the ACARS, and just call them in like another airline does. Guaranteed you can jump up into the top 3.

AA

YEAH! Or we could just release the brakes and pull the circuit breaker like everybody else. :rolleyes:

Pluuueezse.

Gup
 
GuppyWN said:
YEAH! Or we could just release the brakes and pull the circuit breaker like everybody else. :rolleyes:

Pluuueezse.

Gup

And how does that make you on time within :14, which is the stat we are talking about?
 
don't forget about menzies poking holes in airplanes and losing everyones bags
 
shon7 said:
Regardless of anything else -- AS is profitable and making money. That is what counts.

That is because they have financed their future with an "interest only loan" so to speak....There is not a frontline employee( there are a couple of us left)that believes that we are profitable or making money.....no one can cook books as well as the management at Alaska Airlines... We had many years where we ran a very efficient on-time airline, with higher yields and lower labor costs and yet magically we lost money....This is more of the same game...when it suits them they show a profit and when it doesn't they don't.....one of the many reasons they never go outside the Air Group for upper level managers.......Dirty little secrets and dirty little lies work better when kept within the family....
And for the record, we did nothing but our jobs after kasher and it turns out that there was no-one doing all the extra stuff that made the show run....plain and simple.....since that day they have hired hundreds of managers and formed hundreds of committees to try and figure out how to run an airline and for all their effort we just won last place in performance.....so when they finish with their games and line all of their pockets we will also go bankrupt just as those that have gone before us....it is only about money and who has it and who doesn't
 
Tico,

Interesting point. I've always thought that airlines are not here to make money. They're here to generate cashflow. TWA lost money for ten years before they went out. What industry on earth can do that? Only Aviation. These A-holes prop up the company, however they can, to keep the cash flowing. That way they can skim off the top of the huge flood of cash. Nevermind that it isn't profitable, it doesn't matter. What risk does BK have to anybody running an airline? None.

Billy boy and his band of giddy sodomists are bursting at the seams with jealousy that other airlines were able to kill the pensions. If I've learned anything about these sadistic, arrogant bastar*s, is that no matter what, they will get however many pounds of flesh they think they're entitled to. Legal or otherwise. 88 counts of negligent homicide or otherwise.
 
AAflyer said:
Stop using the ACARS, and just call them in like another airline does. Guaranteed you can jump up into the top 3.

AA

Is everyone bitter at AA? Why does this post go back to SWA???

Happy flying,

RB
 
Quit now

Ferlo,

You hate it at Alaska. You're so bitter I can't believe you can stand to work there. When are you leaving for the construction biz?

Your life will be much happier no matter what you do.

Best of luck to you


ferlo said:
Tico,

Interesting point. I've always thought that airlines are not here to make money. They're here to generate cashflow. TWA lost money for ten years before they went out. What industry on earth can do that? Only Aviation. These A-holes prop up the company, however they can, to keep the cash flowing. That way they can skim off the top of the huge flood of cash. Nevermind that it isn't profitable, it doesn't matter. What risk does BK have to anybody running an airline? None.

Billy boy and his band of giddy sodomists are bursting at the seams with jealousy that other airlines were able to kill the pensions. If I've learned anything about these sadistic, arrogant bastar*s, is that no matter what, they will get however many pounds of flesh they think they're entitled to. Legal or otherwise. 88 counts of negligent homicide or otherwise.
 
You get what you pay for.

I feel a lot less tired at the end of the day now that I am not doing someone else's job for them.
 
Not deserved....

This is a pretty sad report. I've watched AS going from being about the best airline in the country, to about the worst. What's amazing is how quickly it happened. The other sad thing is that you can lay this one right at management's feet; it is 100% their fault. As background, I used to travel on AS at least once a week. Sometimes I was a jumpseater (and no airline treats you better), but more often as a paying customer. I was a Mileage Plan MVP in 2004; now I honestly do just about anything to avoid booking them. Every flight lately has been a nightmare, and it's not because of the employees. It's because of the lack of employees. They have fired most of the ticket ageants, and replaced them with electronic ticket machines. That would be fine if A) the machines ever worked properly (on my last trip, they had 6 machines inop in SEA). or B) if the machine was able to process every type of ticket you can buy online. It can't, just for reference. Of course, there is no one who can help, since they've all been let go. Airplanes are broken quite a bit, as I suspect the maintenance budget has been slashed, along with maintenance personnel. They, of course, lost my luggage last trip. It just goes on and on, and the few employees left are simply overwhelmed with an impossible situation. I can also absolutely guarantee that management will reward themselves for their excellent work with huge "performance" bonuses. It saddens me to see a great airline trashed, and it annoys me that I can't fly AS...I believe in rewarding those airlines that are jumpseat-friendly with my business whenever possible.

On the other hand, kudos to UAL. They became my airline-of-choice last year, and I am already a Mileage Plus Premier for '06. I think bankruptcy was a big slap in the face, and it definately changed attitudes (especially the FA's). They went from nightmare status, to a nice airline to ride on in a very short time. I hope they can keep it up over the long haul.
 
O yeah UAL there's an airline to reward with your money! Where do I begin with them? At the top, the bottom the side or.... whoops they just stepped on me because they are so big, fat, loaded with politicians and debt. I can't believe anyone would want to fly them after they problems they have caused in this industry. Nothin' personal UpNDownGuy. Rock on Alaksa! Send em' in to Shock Southwest!
 
of course there is no shortage of eager beavers to fill up those classes

Probably true but not all of the beavers who floated in that 3+ year pool were so eager once they learned about the wood reduction.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top