Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

3:1 rule

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lookin4better

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Posts
6,970
where can i find a good explaination of the 3:1 rule?

thanks
 
You talking about descent profiles? 3 miles per thousand feet of altitude? If so, it works well. Keeps you higher longer and is still a managable vertical path for jets without the introduction of drag for speed problems. Shoot for 10000' @ 30 miles from the place where you're going. That puts you @ 3:1 Run the math and you can get a quick idea about where you should be(alt) vs. how far away you are. All of the jets I've flown will readily out descend a 3:1 path, but there's usually no need to stay up like that. It's an easier descent on the pax(body angle) and ATC generally uses the same target.
 
Last edited:
yup......learned it YEARS ago but have been WAY out of practice and cant find it...is there a rate of descent or ground speed thing involved too? ....Thanks
 
Last edited:
To me, staying "on profile" using 3:1 means starting down from FL310 at 93 miles, being at FL200 at 60 miles, etc. Works for us in a Citation 500.
 
Yeah but it's more fun to be at 410 60 miles out from destination in a learjet, pull it to idle, pop the boards, fuel computers off, and HANG ON! :)
 
yup......learned it YEARS ago but have been WAY out of practice and cant find it...is there a rate of descent or ground speed thing involved too? ....Thanks

I use a descent rate of 5X ground speed, which seems to work well.

i.e. ground speed 400 kts, v/s = 2000 fpm
 
3:1 Works well...

Step 1
To calculate how far in advance you have to descend you multiply the altitude you need to lose by 3. Example...Cross XYZ VOR at 10,000 while you're at FL180. 8 (thousands of feet to lose) x 3 = 24 miles.

Step 2
The vertical speed you will use depends on your groundspeed. The higher the groundspeed the higher your vertical speed to maintain 3 degrees and vice versa.

Groundspeed x 5 works well.
500 kts x 5 = 2500 fpm
400kts x 5 = 2000 fpm

OR
Groundspeed divided by 2
Example on an approach at 180kts
180 divided by 2 = 900 fpm
140 divided by 2 = 700 fpm
 
The 3:1 rule in aviation, simply stated, means only that out of every three marriages you try, one won't drain you completely dry. The 6:1 rule is a better rule, because out of six marriages tried, one might work.

Why would you turn the fuel computers off in the learjet?
 
Why would you turn the fuel computers off in the learjet?

Spool the engines down even lower to get a greater rate of descent. A lear will plummet pretty darn fast if the fans are spinning at 30% as opposed to 75% at idle.

And no, I'm not the one who turned them off. The captain I was flying with did, and believe me it scared the bajeezus out of me until I saw that it actually worked and we didn't die.
 
The definitive 3:1 answer.

There's a great explanation of the 3:1 rule and other Handy Rules of Thumb for aviation found in pages 227-229 of "The Turbine Pilot's Flight Manual".

All concepts are clearly written and easy to understand.

cheers
 

Latest resources

Back
Top