We had a big discussion with varying views today about FAR 135.265 (a) (3)
No more than 34 hours in any 7 consecutive days.
So what's the intent of the rule and are their any supporting documents or rationale?
The discussion went to ways:
1) Look back 7 days and you should never find more than 34 hours flight time
and
2) That if you have 24 hours off duty than the 7 day clock starts over?
The definition of consecutive says without a break, does that mean #1 above or a break as in time off?
In other words if you flew 7.8 hours each day;
Tues OFF
Wed 7.8
Thur 7.8
Fri 7.8
Sat Off
Sun Off
Mon 7.8
Tues CAN YOU FLY????? Well more than 2.8 hours?
Thanks so much for the insight.
CloudyIFR
No more than 34 hours in any 7 consecutive days.
So what's the intent of the rule and are their any supporting documents or rationale?
The discussion went to ways:
1) Look back 7 days and you should never find more than 34 hours flight time
and
2) That if you have 24 hours off duty than the 7 day clock starts over?
The definition of consecutive says without a break, does that mean #1 above or a break as in time off?
In other words if you flew 7.8 hours each day;
Tues OFF
Wed 7.8
Thur 7.8
Fri 7.8
Sat Off
Sun Off
Mon 7.8
Tues CAN YOU FLY????? Well more than 2.8 hours?
Thanks so much for the insight.
CloudyIFR