DieselDragRacer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Posts
- 11,056
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt "they" came up with this defense. Start thinking more like a lawyer than a pilot if you want to figure this stuff out.They should be suspended forever for coming up with such a LAME defense!!!
Cole also said in his filing that he should not be punished or his punishment should be mitigated because he relied on Cheney as the pilot in command of the aircraft to fulfill his responsibilities.
I wouldn't expect anything less, it's the American way, "everybody else's fault but mine".
They are doing what their attonerys' tell them to do, and they should.
I would fight just like them especially when there are ASAP violations, and confidentiality violations by the NTSB that are a threat to safety programs that have made the industry safety record what it is today.
"no side of their story" will explain their lack of situtational awareness!!...forget about the radio relay, the crewmeals, the computer stuff and the support of the pastor..NOTHING can explain NOT doing your job and looking at your screens/instruments every once in awhile to see what the frick the airplane's doing...
You don't seem to get it; the issue isn't whether or not it appears they screwed up, the issue is that they were denied due process and the ability to voice their side of the story. This isn't North Korea or Iran, and there was no need to deny these guys a hearing.
The ARE getting a hearing so you can dispense with the "Axis of Evil"
Any pilot who believes that these two should ever occupy the cockpit of a commercial aircraft again should take a hard look at the standards they are applying to themselves........ then quit.
No, they are not getting a hearing; they are getting to appeal an Emergency Revocation.
Appealing an Emergency Revocation is a lot different than going through an investigation and a hearing.![]()
I would suspect that the louder one screams and rails against these guys, the younger and more inexperienced the person is that's making the noise. . . .
This case doesn't directly affect you or me, but the Emergency Revocation without a hearing is very troubling, and the repercussions from this will stink even worse.
Seems to me that the most judgemental pilots among us are not superior aviators, they are just management's wet dream, and you, my friend, are management's wettest dream.
Congratulations, pal. Karma's a bitch, hope you enjoy being married to her.:laugh:
what a screwed up system
seems to me the most judgemental pilots among us are not superior aviators
We had a captain with a day one FO refuse to go around when told to by a controller because of an abort on the runway. He ended up off the runway broken in half when he put the gear up before stopping his descent, tore off the right engine on a very late go around attempt. The 737 was a hull loss. He went to FO for a year and came back as a captain.
I doubt these "pilots" (and I use that term loosly) will be returning to the unfiendly skies again. I wouldn't even trust them as flight instructors. How long will they keep on passing the beer around until it gets warm? Well, another lesson learned in the airline business.
This is off the subject, but where did you get your avatar? Are you a fan of Bonanza Air Lines? The first airplane I ever flew on was a BAL F-27 "silver dart" from Vegas to Reno in 1961...It was thrilling as a 5 yr. old, and I attribute that and later flights on Bonanza F-27s as a big part of my motivation to become a pilot. I was sort of BAL "obsessed" as a kid...do you have any connection with Bonanza?Air California at SNA by any chance???