Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Emb 120

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Cowboypilot

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Posts
88
Hello all.
My employer is considering buying a ex regional EMB 120. Could some of you with experience in the aircraft give me some "numbers". The EMB website doesnt help much. Some questions I have are:
What is the max fuel cap.? What is the burn rate first hour, second. If topped off how many pax can you get on? What is the "real world" best cruise altitude? TAS at that altitude? What does the "A" mod to the engines do for you?
Please feel free to ad any info you can. If aquired we will reoutfit to 19 pax.
Thanks in advance.
 
MGW 25529
MTOW 25353
MLW 24802
ZFW 23148

Max fuel is 2928??? Per side It had a four hour range don't remember exact hourly fuel burns but I think we just said about 1,000 per hour was average. It will cruise at 23,000 but above that it was not very good. It will do 250ish in cruise depending on weight and temp. I don't remember the A mod. The above number are for the RT the ER is higher.

Scary I haven't flown it since 2001 and have typed on three other airplanes since but those are the only numbers from any airplane I can still dig out.

Would be a great airplane with 19 pax you can load it up full fuel and take a lot of bags... We were usually weight restricted to about 25-27 pax in summer due to weight, and bags.
 
Last edited:
EMB 120 ER MTOW 26433
Zero fuel Weight 24030
Fuel burn rule of thumb 1000 an hour
With the new FAA weights with 30 pax you can only take 750+/- in the back, and even then you might have to move the crew bags inside. More importantly the FAA is about to rule the collins FMS unsuitable for enroute navigation. And if the FAA has its way the go around weights when in icing conditions will shave 1500+/- pounds off of landing weight.

From a pilots perspective though she is a bute to fly.
 
most fun you'll have at the airline level these days

3000# gas will get you just about anywhere

1000#/hr is an excellent wag

don't run the packs on high - they will fry

Brasilia mantra: adjust power - adjust trim (rudder)

quite a machine, but very finicky. master that plane and the rest of your career will be a piece of cake.

and please don't call it 'the Bro'. it's an Emb-120 Brasilia.
 
I'll call it whatever I want to.

Turbo Taco, Mexican King Air, Brasilnut, Brasildo... with affection, of course. :)
 
What about "Bra?" or Bra-Killya.

I think it's uncle Pedro Brasilia's family project. the system integration is like each family member got a major system, designed it, and then threw it all together at the end. It has something like 34 electrical busses, right?? I still don't "really" know what happens during a "soft transfer." thank you very much a neill...

Mookie
 
call it what you like...but they all sound silly and childish.

yes, i'm a bit sensitive about my first type rating. but i like the plane and appreciate what it gave to my career.

then again...i never had a prop overspeed to attempt murder on me either. then i might have a number of not-so-nice names to call the Brasilia.

flame away SkyWest'rs!
 
What about "Bra?" or Bra-Killya.

I think it's uncle Pedro Brasilia's family project. the system integration is like each family member got a major system, designed it, and then threw it all together at the end. It has something like 34 electrical busses, right?? I still don't "really" know what happens during a "soft transfer." thank you very much a neill...

Mookie

Yeah, how did I leave "Bra-Killya" out?

Palomino, the EMB-120 is my ONLY type rating. The names may be childish, but there's nothing wrong with having a little fun. After all, we should try
to have at least some fun when we're flying. We can't always talk about
our CBA and the amendable date, etc.
 
I like "vibroliner" ;-)

RT Weights
Ramp 25529
Takeoff 25353
Landing 24802
Zero Fuel 23148

ER Weights
Ramp 26609
Takeoff 26443
Landing 25794
Zero Fuel 24030

As far as engines, 118 vs 118A/B, The A/B's are newer with slightly higher temp/torque numbers. I've never flown with straight 118's, so no other info. We operate the A's and B's interchanably.

Max fuel is 2866 pounds/side.
Good alt is 200-250, depending on leg length of course.
Overall I love flying the Brazilia.
 
EMB 120 ER MTOW 26433
Zero fuel Weight 24030
Fuel burn rule of thumb 1000 an hour
With the new FAA weights with 30 pax you can only take 750+/- in the back, and even then you might have to move the crew bags inside. More importantly the FAA is about to rule the collins FMS unsuitable for enroute navigation. And if the FAA has its way the go around weights when in icing conditions will shave 1500+/- pounds off of landing weight.

From a pilots perspective though she is a bute to fly.

If they are going to be flying part 91, there are no standard FAA pax weights to contend with, specially with only 19 seats.
 
thank you, but please keep some operational experience coming. I got some weights, but how about an average empty weight. What is the max fuel at 19 pax.
Thanks again.
 
i recall an empty weight of around 17,000 lbs give or take.

so my guess is...

30 pax @ 190 = 5700
45 bags @ 30 lbs = 1350

17.0
5.7
+1.4
24.4

26.4
-24.4
2.0 fuel with full pax/avg bags in a 30 seat config

19 pax @ 190 = 3610
1000# bags

17.0
3.6
+1.0
21.6
26.4
-21.6
4.8 fuel with 19/avg bags

that's how i remember the numbers for an ER model. but, it's been 7 years since i've flown one.
 
try to get ahold of some of the guys who fly them for nascar teams. i iheard that Jr. E has one of skywest's old bra's.

mookie
 
Get to know where the flap reset button is. Don't hold in icing conditions. Aux Gens will fail every other leg. Cool airplane.
 
I hope your company has substantial maintenance assets, or a big MX budget.

It's not that the 120 is unreliable, but as others have pointed out, it's a very complex airplane systems wise.

And despite the Mexican king Air nickname, she's no King Air when it comes to systems.

Great airplane though, in almost 3000 hours, it only tried to kill me twice. :)
 
Hello all.
My employer is considering buying a ex regional EMB 120. Could some of you with experience in the aircraft give me some "numbers". The EMB website doesnt help much. Some questions I have are:
What is the max fuel cap.? What is the burn rate first hour, second. If topped off how many pax can you get on? What is the "real world" best cruise altitude? TAS at that altitude? What does the "A" mod to the engines do for you?
Please feel free to ad any info you can. If aquired we will reoutfit to 19 pax.
Thanks in advance.

Cowboy, we are a 91 corp flight dept and we added an EMB-120 (RT) to our fleet in 2005. Purchased from Skywest who got it from Comair. Used to be 162CA. The FAA allowed us to go to a low utilization mx plan after a year of operations under our belt. Have had very few mx issues. I would for sure recommend the PW118A/B and an ER model if you will ever do much high/hot or long legs.
 
In my oppinion the E-120 has poor flying characteristics. It is heavy on all axis, and consitently needs to be trimed. I have only flown the ER model, and the specs above are correct. The engines are very reliable, however the propellers are the planes Achiles heal. The other systems are pretty simple and reliable. Reoccuring problems are gear door locks coming un done, as well as flap dissagreements. Max speed is 272 kt and this can be achieved under power straight and level. Like most turbo props it can slow quickly. One virtue of the E-120 is its ability to land in a short distance. Are fleet of 60 are very reliable over all and we have few major mx problems.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top