This has nothing to do with entitlement. It has everything to do with taking a look around and realizing that we are all on a slippery slope to nowhere good.
You're right, we ARE on a slippery slope to nowhere good, but not in the way you're preaching.
Fuel prices have always gone up. Lease prices have always gone up. Maintenance costs, gate and counter leases at airports, landing fees, everything has always gone up with inflation.
But we're supposed to sit back and watch our wages continually decrease or not even increase with inflation? In every other business we pass that cost onto the customer. Here, people like you allow management to pass that cost onto US. Why is that? Fear? or Apathy?
I submit that you are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Airlines that just recently came out of bankruptcy are reporting record losses,
No, they're not. Check your facts, buddy. They're posting losses, yes, due to increased fuel prices and their refusal to raise FARES to OFFSET their costs, but they are NOWHERE NEAR "record" losses, and are recoverable by the end of the year if the industry would raise fares across the board.
oil is $120 a barrel and climbing, and no less than 5 airlines have shut the doors in the past month.
Fuel has only been above $100 for a few months. Those airlines didn't shut their doors because of fuel prices alone; those airlines shut their doors because they were unable to compete, in each airline's case, for different reasons.
Frankly, those of us who are still employeed should be damn glad. Sorry if that doesn't fit into the "take one for the team" mentailty that exists on here, but this isn't 1960.
And that's why you will NEVER, EVER see pay and QOL equal to that of the 1960's.
1. You're just "glad to have a job" instead of realizing that YOU ARE A NECESSARY PART OF THE EQUATION FOR COMPANIES TO MAKE MONEY. If they don't employ pilots (and mechanics, and gate agents, and f/a's, etc), THEY won't make any money. Should your V.P. of Flight Ops, CFO, and CEO just be "glad to have a job"? Grow a pair, for Christ's sake.
2. You believe somehow that now is different than the 60's in terms of being paid a fare wage or a wage that increases at least equal to inflation. Why is it different? The U.S. is still the U.S. Our constitution is still in place. The only thing that has changed is that people like you refuse to stand up for themselves.
Our founding fathers would be ashamed.
I'm all for doing the work to make things better, but in this current state I fail to see how a one-day walk out that would cetainly be the death of a couple more carriers or burning the entire industry to the ground as some are suggesting is going to help me, you, or anyone else.
OK, remember you said that, I'm going to make a point here.
ONE day. ONE day of airlines not flying is going to "certainly be the death of a couple more carriers"...
What happens when there's a snowstorm in JFK that shuts down 90%+ of jetBlue flights? Oh, that's right, the very next year they post the SMALLEST loss of any carrier and are better-positioned cash-wise than ANY other carrier (on a percentage of cash flow basis).
What happens when AA grounds over 30% of their domestic fleet and strand thousands upon thousands of passengers? Oh, that's right, they still have record-high load factors and go right back to doing business the next day.
Things are worse now I believe than after 9/11 and people are in denial or think if they screw Ornstein or Steenland that things will get better.
Worse than after 9/11? Wait a minute, you just said above that one day of not-operating would "certainly be the death of a couple carriers". If memory serves (and I was sitting watching the senate hearings while NOTHING was flying in the skies except military aircraft), we were almost a WEEK without a SINGLE COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT operating in U.S. airspace, and I don't seem to remember it being "the death of a couple carriers".
The teachers in Michigan walked off their job, en masse, and went right back to teaching class when their dispute was settled BECAUSE KIDS STILL NEEDED TO BE IN SCHOOL.
The New York transit workers walked off the job, en masse, and the system went right back to functioning as soon as they went back, BECAUSE PEOPLE STILL NEEDED TO TRAVEL.
If the aviation world shuts down (again) for a few days, PEOPLE WILL STILL NEED TO TRAVEL and the system will go right back to functioning.
You're WAY out there, my friend. It's alarmist, and it's bullsh*t. The U.S. Air Carrier business isn't going anywhere. Would the public be angry? Absolutely. Would they support us? They don't support (or care) about us now, all they care about is their $39 fare to MCO. Would they return to fly? Absolutely; they do it every time there's a large shutdown of a carrier for weather or maintenance.
And as far as this being worse than after 9/11, you're smoking crack. THOSE were record losses. People were AFRAID to fly. That has nothing to do with a nation-wide SOS.
Like I said before, I don't think it would work, and you proved my point nicely: "There are too many weak sisters who would still show up to work and undermine those who DO have a backbone."
This industry is frakked. It will never be what it was, and I, for one, am sick and tired of fighting for myself and my fellow pilots when they can't even be bothered to fight for themselves.
/rant