Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

F9 cuts Republic

  • Thread starter Thread starter D-Bo
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 15

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
There's plenty of crap to worry about nowadays, but having anyone else flying airplanes that say Horizon on the side shouldn't be on the list. I haven't researched it, but I imagine the AS pilots have similar protection.

Just playing the devil's advocate here, but might not the economics of something in the 90-100 seat range plus the whipsaw value make it a viable option? When Alaska reworked its capacity purchase agreement with Horizon several years ago it sure looked like they were trying to redefine the relationship more as an "express" type agreement and less as synergy between two complimentary companies.

It's a buyer's market for small jet lift right now-I'm guessing that Alaska could get someone to agree to some fairly rigorous brand-preserving performance criteria in oder to close the deal. Handing out free beer ain't rocket science after all. There are obviously pilots out there willing to fly the planes for next to nothing-can you see Sky West pilots turning down an opportunity to fly EMB 190's for a few bucks over their RJ rates? Not likely.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom