Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

A new way for ALPA to collect dues

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

a320drivr

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Posts
385
ITEM 5: ALPA National Updates
5a: In light of the recent or impending loss of a large number of
pilots from ALPA, including those from US Airways, America West,
Skyway, Aloha, ATA, and Champion, ALPA faces a significant shortfall
in its operating budget from diminished dues revenues. The ALPA
Executive Council and Executive Board, at its recent meeting this
week, took action on two items that will help close the gap on this
funding shortfall.
The first initiative passed by the Council and the Board were the
adoption of two resolutions to change both the Constitution and By-
Laws and the Administrative Manual to allow 401(k) contributions to
be subject to ALPA dues for all ALPA pilots. Current policy exempts
401(k) contributions from dues if a 401(k) plan is the only form of
retirement plan available to a pilot group, such as here at PSA. If a
pilot group had access to a Defined Contribution or similar plan,
their 401(k) contributions would be subject to dues. With the
freezing or elimination of virtually all of these available plans at
those carriers, the pilots of those carriers find themselves paying
dues on 401(k) contributions while that plan is their sole remaining
retirement vehicle. In the interest of fairness and with
consideration of the fiscal shortfall, the Council and Board adopted
the proposed resolutions to subject all 401(k) contributions to ALPA
dues. This change will not take effect until it is approved by a 2/3
majority vote of the Board of Directors.
The second initiative passed by the Council and the Board was the
adoption of a resolution to change the way LEC surpluses are handled
by the Association. Currently, LEC budgets are funded from the
Administrative and Support (A&S) account based on a per capita rate
for each pilot in that domicile, with any LEC budget surpluses at the
end of the year being credited to that airline's MEC account for use
in the future. The resolution adopted by the Council and Board will
change policy to direct any LEC budget surpluses back to the A&S
account at the end of each year. This change will help close the
shortfall in A&S account funding and preserve the services available
to pilots, LEC's, and MEC's from the Association.
 
Why don't they just fire some of the no-loads that work there.
 
Or take away the ridiculous raises given to the office staff (who apparently make more than most of us) when they struck a few years ago. Almost every single constituent that they work for was taking pay cuts and losing jobs, and they all got raises.

If they start taxing 401k contributions (which the fed doesn't even do), it will be time to end dues check off and whatever else can happen.
 
Sounds like it's time to change from Alpo to Mighty Dog
 
so let me get this correct
(assume flight pay = $55/hr, for a particular month you got 87.0 hours credit/pay and you do 10% 401K)

dues collected now (before this bs proposal) are 87X55=4785 gross, less 10% 401k, 4785-478.5=4306.5
then they take the 1.95% alpa from the 4306.5 for
1.95%X4306.6 = $83.98

but now they want to

$55/hrX87h=$4785 time 1.95% = $93.31
 
ITEM 5: ALPA National Updates
5a: In light of the recent or impending loss of a large number of
pilots from ALPA, including those from US Airways, America West,
Skyway, Aloha, ATA, and Champion, ALPA faces a significant shortfall
in its operating budget from diminished dues revenues. The ALPA
Executive Council and Executive Board, at its recent meeting this
week, took action on two items that will help close the gap on this
funding shortfall.
The first initiative passed by the Council and the Board were the
adoption of two resolutions to change both the Constitution and By-
Laws and the Administrative Manual to allow 401(k) contributions to
be subject to ALPA dues for all ALPA pilots. Current policy exempts
401(k) contributions from dues if a 401(k) plan is the only form of
retirement plan available to a pilot group, such as here at PSA. If a
pilot group had access to a Defined Contribution or similar plan,
their 401(k) contributions would be subject to dues. With the
freezing or elimination of virtually all of these available plans at
those carriers, the pilots of those carriers find themselves paying
dues on 401(k) contributions while that plan is their sole remaining
retirement vehicle. In the interest of fairness and with
consideration of the fiscal shortfall, the Council and Board adopted
the proposed resolutions to subject all 401(k) contributions to ALPA
dues. This change will not take effect until it is approved by a 2/3
majority vote of the Board of Directors.
The second initiative passed by the Council and the Board was the
adoption of a resolution to change the way LEC surpluses are handled
by the Association. Currently, LEC budgets are funded from the
Administrative and Support (A&S) account based on a per capita rate
for each pilot in that domicile, with any LEC budget surpluses at the
end of the year being credited to that airline's MEC account for use
in the future. The resolution adopted by the Council and Board will
change policy to direct any LEC budget surpluses back to the A&S
account at the end of each year. This change will help close the
shortfall in A&S account funding and preserve the services available
to pilots, LEC's, and MEC's from the Association.

So I guess the way it seem now, alpa wants 'a piece of YOUR retirement money.'

Well, Herndon VA is not that far from Washington DC; and glad to see that the leadership has adopted the mantra of our elected leaders in congress. NO need to cut spending/expenses when we can just 'raise taxes.'

This might be a little easier for the membership to take, if, alpa leadership would have looked at reducing 'spending/expenses' First. Maybe the top officers of alpa taking a 10-20% cut in their $350,000+/yrs pay, or eliminating their 'living expense allowance' (currently about $9850./mth, in addition to their $350,000+/yr. salary), or reducing some of the office staff (you know, the $60,000-70,000/yr. Admin. Asst. etc). Well, I guess NONE of that is going to happen, what next, increasing the dues or assessments??

I guess it worked for them pushing so hard for them to change 'age 60,' so all of those guys, at top of scale, can stay around another 5yrs. to pay alpa more in dues.

Also, we have to face the facts; if even one DFR suit against alpa ever get before a jury (granted DFR suits are hard to prove and win, but a possibility with alpa recent leadership or lack there of), and wins a judgement again alpa, and they will be in 'receivership.' But, I guess they are already 'morally BK' so not far to go from there.

Just really, really Sad.

PD
 
ALPA's new Secretary/Treasurer was elected largely due to support of Group B airlines. I suggest if you are in group B you contact him ASAP with your concerns.

If your carrier has an A or B plan retirement program, you 401k was already getting taxed. This affects those companies with only 401ks.
 
Last edited:
Cut Prater some slack. He told us he was "takin' it back".......apparently he meant from the membership as well.
 
Last edited:
Let me get this straight...

They haven't been doing their jobs in representing their membership and protecting the profession...
To the extent that they have been and are on the road to being thrown out left and right...
SO rather than a complete overhaul of how they do things...they are going to FURTHER ALIENATE their membership who stuck around, and essentially TAX their retirement...something even the GOVT can not do.
Wow. :bomb: That just be the ignition match.
 
Last edited:
How about we all just say no F'in way and if they don't back down on this re-call 'em all. they can cut thier pay and perks just as the rest of the industry has done.
 
How about we all just say no F'in way and if they don't back down on this re-call 'em all. they can cut thier pay and perks just as the rest of the industry has done.

Well, after alpa 'national' pushed for the change to age 60, against the wishes of a majority of the membership, many said then, 'recall prater.' Did go anywhere then, probably won't happen now.

alpa 'national' represents 'alpa national's interests' and very likely that will fight any attempts to recall anyone in leadership.

Its a 'corrupt' organization from the top down, and they will protect their 'kingdom' Count on it!! The 'membership' (rank and file), are nolonger the most important issue for them, they just 'pay lip-service' to the members, but make no mistake, it is all about 'the organization' and that is 'alpa national.'

For what its worth.

PD
 
Like I said earlier... Recall Prater. Do it now. He is hurting the profession as much as any manager.

Recalling Prater will not do anything. The US Airways pilots have the right idea. We all need to decertify ALPA at our respective airlines and start in-house unions. There is no unity between different carriers' pilot groups anyway. Why pretend? Look at NWA/Delta, US Airways/American West, majors/regionals, etc. ALPA is a bought-off, has-been organization that is hopeless. There are too many dishonest employees high up, and too many conflicting interests. IMHO, it's time for change. I am just a lowly line pilot so nothing I say matters anyway even if I am the majority. e.g. Age 65.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom