Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Search results for query: *

  • Users: Mugs
  • Order by date

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
  1. M

    Fatigue Check

    Good. Now check your cross-wind skills. (Somebody else posted this one quite a while ago). http://www.ebaumsworld.com/papertoss.html
  2. M

    Fatigue Check

    Just wanted to make sure everyone is getting enough sleep and the reflexes are sharp. http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbody/sleep/sheep/reaction_version5.swf
  3. M

    UAL pulling out of MDW

  4. M

    UAL pulling out of MDW

    Shouldn't that be obvious simply by the nature of the operation? Had the point of CH11 been to match those CASMs, it would have required a liquidation and a new startup that is nothing like the current operation. If you are looking for those types of low CASMs, you don't achieve it with an...
  5. M

    UAL pulling out of MDW

    Probably true. At least to the point where the duplication of service in the Chicago market was not worth the cost. Not at all surprising. Apparently AA felt the same way about it.
  6. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Impressive. Did you come up with that while munching on your cereal this morning? FlyPdx. Nope. Civilian only, with the upmost respect for those that served.
  7. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Exactly. And since what they invested in was inherently more expensive, it requires a revenue premium to make it work. That revenue premium is what has been missing and in turn has made several legacies, as Canyon so well put it, unable to pay their bills. SWA invested in far less expensive...
  8. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    For decades the legacy carriers have invested in expanding and improving the aviation infrastructure, rather than clinging on to second rate airports like MDW for most of their history. An aviation system that can't get a businessman from Minot to Milan or Milwaukee is far from complete...
  9. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Embellishment for the current campaign against the WA. If Herb was qouted as feeling this way in the years immediately after the WA, it would be more interesting. Established low cost secondary airports and staying under legacy radar was the main goal required for SWA's survival in those...
  10. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Hardly. We get to live it. All I was doing was demonstrating for you that SWA is no different than AMR in behavior / tactics when defending a position they invested a significant amount of money in given an understood set of circumstances (a Federal Law in AMR's case). The bully talk is nonsense.
  11. M

    Southwest's Artful Approach

    If I often post hateful and untrue statements on SWA threads as you claim, why haven't you lobbied the moderators to ban me then? Such alleged behavior, if true, should be grounds for dismissal. Why don't you get on that project instead of being so "rational" as the bookeeper of screen names...
  12. M

    Southwest's Artful Approach

    Yawn. How typical. Take the other side of an issue involving SWA, like the Wright Amendment, and you are automatically anti-SWA and the Flightinfo cult swoops in. I thought this forum was about debate. You guys really get wrapped around the axle attempting to do that. You know you work for...
  13. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    You guys signed your name to the deal. Nobody held the Daisey Rifle to your heads. Live with it.
  14. M

    Southwest's Artful Approach

    Thanks Martha.
  15. M

    Southwest's Artful Approach

    Really? Heck I've peaked in on this board since 1997. I have to say that of all the responses I have seen, the one I got when I evidently ticked off one of your "SWAPA Bro's" took the cake. That of course was being informed that I had been "reported" to the guy keeping "the list" of "SWA...
  16. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    The issue is not closing Love Field. The issue is keeping the Wright Amendment in place. So SWA's had the right to protest Peotone based on their investment in MDW. They also point out the right they have to terminate their lease based on the contract with the City if they don't like...
  17. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Of course, Tejas. Do you guys have a selective memory when it comes to the history of your own company? From the Chicago Tribune Archives...
  18. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Sort of reminds me of SWA threatening the City of Chicago a few years back when there was lots of talk about the third airport at Peotone. Threats, scare tactics.... of leaving MDW and the Chicago market.
  19. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    If that is the case, why did SWA's PR department not respond when asked about it by the media? The article says the flights were diverted "from the airport." That does not sound at all like they simply landed on a parallel runway. If SWA is going to win over their case in the media on the...
  20. M

    Wright Fight Update zzzzzzzzzzzz

    Why don't you tell us? Oh, I forgot SWA "knows nothing about them" despite evidence to the contrary. Is it OK to waste your customers' time while playing a game of manipulation?
Back
Top